David Anderson
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
David AndersonMemberI agree that a 1 (depending on the action of course ) is pretty far down the scale, you might get a better allround twig with a 2 weight in mid length (7 -8 feet ish)..
Or a short 3, they throw hoppers and larger dries pretty easy yet are still twiggy in feel.
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberThe Sage XP 11′ #6 is a great rod for big water nymphing, I’ve used one on the Tongariro river for the last few years and it’s the best rod for the big team of flies and huge indicator used there.
With a 7 weight line this thing will lift & cast a lot of weight with no fuss.I’ve seen a couple for sale second hand here in OZ in the last couple months.
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberI think the SLT 9′ #4 is one of the best trout rods ever and if it wasn’t for the TCR6 I would say it was the best Sage rod I’ve ever owned or cast.
Winston also make some real sweet sticks in 4 weight, the 8′ WT is a lovely rod as well.So that’s a tough question – and my answer is now ZXL.
Just got one in 8’6 #3 and it’s a lovely rod, I can’t compare it directly to an SLT #3 because I’ve only got the 2 and 4, but what I can say is it’s VERY smooth and a very sweet rod.
Haven’t fished with it yet because my first trip of the season starts this thursday, so I’ll give everyone a full rundown when I get back.www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberGo Pokes!
??
Is that like saying “go the Wallabies” ?
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberNice solid fish..
Where are you at there ? Wyoming ?
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberWow, what great color on the big brookie.
Thanks for putting the shots up !
Our first trip of the season is thursday – still a bit early for the small streams we fish, they’ll be high & going hard, but we’ll fish them anyway.. ๐
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMember(( Hey Spencer, thanks for paying for all my busted rods !!
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberThose are great clips, what a good idea from American Angler.
Zach, will you tell them that I said thanks..
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberJpegs out of modern cameras are good and getting better – they are however still a compromise.
A raw file with a little effort will always give you a better image.
You do your contrast, sharpness, white balance, saturation ect ect ect shot by shot.As to memory cards – they now cost less than shooting film did per shot.
I could shoot a 4 gig, download it and then throw it away and still be spending less than I used to on the smae number of shots on tranny film with proc.
And that’s on 16+MP’s..www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberCourty,
I haven’t tried one yet – to busy trying to get my greasy mitts on the DSIII .. ๐
35mm is not wide enough for shooting on boats IMO, not even close.
Mind you, that would be for publishing shots, for personal stuff it would be fine for man with fish shots and some limited landscape stuff.
If you’re looking at adaptors make sure they’re quick & easy to use – you wouldn’t want to be stuck with it on or off while trying to shoot.
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberAll very nice Eric, I like the mix of detail & situations shots.
My favorite is the kids at the end because it’s a strong portrait of the one child in front but by going a bit wider and getting a bit of the other kids in you’ve given it greater depth.
(nice post prod. as well)Are these shot for a magazine ?
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberNice shots Camron, yes the dog looks about as excited about fishing as I am about golf.. ;D
Trout season opens here on the weekend ! ๐
Thanks as well for the food shot !
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberZach,
Any idea when the new William Joseph retro gear is going to go public ?www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMember
How the hell did they let this guy through customs….
That my friends is a Kiwi or as I like to call them ‘Unzudians’ because they’re from UnZud – the giveaway is the All Blacks shirt, that slight fear of Australians that never leaves their eyes and the faint odor of sheep love.
Go the mighty Wallabies.
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberHi Will, I have a couple 1Ds II’s. ( full frame ) but have 1DS III’s on order and should have them by mid November – fingers crossed..
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberMark,
I shoot most of my macro stuff with a 100 2.8 USM, it’s avery sharp lens andwww.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberHi Will, I agree, you have a beautiful website, I love the river shots..
Your gear shots are also very well done – it’s great to see such hi quality in fishing photos, I think it adds sizzle to our sport.I also agree that a lot of fly photography is boring and I try to do all mine out on the water.
But for a book on fly tying or a book of patterns I would go the simple studio set-up.www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberI have a bunch of dry bags in sizes from single lens or flash up to 30 litres, the soft ones are very light, fold up very small and are a good thing to have a couple off if the weather turns nasty.
Another kind you can get is a little more solid with a couple D rings on them and in the smaller sizes you can stash a second lens and wear it like a sling.
I get them from canoe shops.
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberI’d love an IA tee shirt XXL would do it ย ๐
A Wet T-shirt ?
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
David AndersonMemberHi Matt,
This is a question that has more answers then George W has enemies…
First thing you need is a soft light source above the fly ( a couple feet ), an on camera flash with mini softbox or bouncer is good enough.
The flash should be almost directly overhead but angled in slightly from the lens ( 20 deg. ? )Below the fly you need a white reflector ( bright white card or heavy paper ) it also needs to be almost directly below but angled up slightly from the front (again 20 deg. ).
You need to do this in a space where the flash wont bonce light off other surfaces and might even need to black out around the front, back and sides.
You dont want dead flat light like i see in a few shots of this nature, IMO shadows give a photo shape and depth, flat light is boring.
Behind the fly you can have almost any background from paper to board or even a shirt or wall.
You need to experiment with the distance from the fly to the background to get the color and level of blur you like.
A lot of this will depend on the lens you use and how far back from the fly it is when focused close enought to fill the frame.For example moving the fly from 2 to 3 feet from a mid blue background might change it to dark blue in the picture.
It’s a very hard thing to type out, you need to have a muck around and see what comes out..
You can get light tents that surround the fly and are lit from above but I don’t like the look they give shots, flat and lifeless.
Have fun..
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
-
AuthorPosts