yuhina
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Friends,
attached 2 recent watercolor paintings, first one is Colorado cutthroat 8×10; second one is bull trout 36×24. More works display in my illustration blog. http://www.yuhinaillustration.blogspot.com
Neal, Flies and fins, these guys are pretty cool…the guy with blue shirt, Jeremy, produce several nice fishing songs too.
Mike,
I do not know how they design these new series of lens. As soon as they still use the Vario-Sonar, Distagon, Plannar, I would assume they still use the old design. Well, in my opinion (pretty strong actually), I would say using the Contax lens (Zeiss) is just like nymphing with pheasant tail, they give me 100% confidence and never fail me.
Thanks David for the report! very nice!
You know the gear you have is good for models, landscapes, fishing photos, wildlife, and even Olympic game… one of the great machine to dream about… 🙂
That is awesome! While we are nymphing hard here, the Hopper/Dryfly season just started in Chile.
Good luck and look forward to the photos and reports! 🙂On the Dam photo if you look hard you can see a blue spot. Some of the others had several blue spots in them. I’m assuming they were light from the stars behind the camera because I didn’t cover the viewfinder. What do you think?
Very warm photos! Mike 😀 I like it!
about the blue triangle dots.
I think it’s less likely to be “star light” from the back (viewfinder), because the star light is so weak, usually take one or two hours exposure to let them “kick in”… Instead, I think the blue dots might came from the front
Darrin,
Nice report!!
I always love to see the fly and technique report! What a great day… I have that fly in my box too… maybe I should use it more often!! Thanks for the sharing!
Great photos gentlemen!
What richard have said is
“…The image format size also will affect the depth of field. The larger the format size, the longer a lens will need to be to capture the same framing as a smaller format. In motion pictures, for example, a frame with a 12 degree horizontal field of view will require a 50 mm lens on 16 mm film, a 100 mm lens on 35 mm film, and a 250 mm lens on 65 mm film. Conversely, using the same focal length lens with each of these formats will yield a progressively wider image as the film format gets larger: a 50 mm lens has a horizontal field of view of 12 degrees on 16 mm film, 23.6 degrees on 35 mm film, and 55.6 degrees on 65 mm film. What this all means is that because the larger formats require longer lenses than the smaller ones, they will accordingly have a smaller depth of field. Therefore, compensations in exposure, framing, or subject distance need to be made in order to make one format look like it was filmed in another format…” from Wilipedia have a great detail about the DOF
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_fieldSome P&S have macro function, bring the subject closer to your camera, they will give you similar effect. “But” if your fish is too big! You might end up just capture one eye! that is cool too
Owl season is just starting and come the end of Jan I should be getting or have newer (hopefully better) images of a variety of Species including more Snowy and hopefully some Hawk Owls. Shoot me a pm if you want some.
That is too kind/generous of you! John… I appreciated! 😀
No kidding, these are Professional level photos!Are you saying “Hawk Owl”!!!
RIO Gold!!
The sharkskin hasn’t performed too well lately, it tends to soak up a little waterThanks Paul,
Nice to hear this comparison!This owl series are too awesome! I would love to buy some, if you got some post cards!
Thanks for the posting John…
