J A Y M O R R
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I use two apps when working in RAW and then export them to my photo library or other gallery apps.
Check out Photogene. It is pretty cheap and is more of a photo editor but it supports RAW. http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/photogene-for-ipad/id363448251?mt=8#
The more expensive piRAWnha uses RAW and I use it but it is $9.99 http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pirawnha/id409747795?mt=8#
It has been buggy and I am not sure I would buy it.I also own portfolio. And although it does not support RAW, you can export your RAW images and display them in portfolio when you are done.
All great questions. Also, thank you for the kind feedback. Will….I have always enjoyed your macro work. It is top shelf and something I have always aspired to. 😉
In regards to LR3 vs. CS5 – I will do my best to explain some basic differences and let you know why I use both.
LR does not use layering. I have a much better experience with layering, text, and selections with CS5. All of these combined with blend modes and the ability to record my workflow within CS5 help me save various tasks and apply them as actions later on. I use a lot of brushes, I even create my own, something of which LR will not handle. Actions in CS5 are the same as what you would call a preset in LR. I create a lot of actions in CS5 and it helps speed up my workflow and give my imagery the style that you see.
LR has some distinct advantages over CS5. Non-destructive editing is arguably the best thing that LR has to offer. Creating virtual files or a “duplicate of a RAW image does not take up additional space on your HD. Unlike CS5 where saving multiple TIFS can result in more HD space being chewed up. The virtual files are easy to work with in LR and I use it all the time when making additional copies of my work and when I need to do minor touch ups. LR has an awesome export and import feature. Way better than CS5. The preview windows are large, you can see your imports, you can “quick collect” favorites and also export with some very nice print options. If any of you upload to other sites on the web, LR is a great way to do it. LR was made for “togs” by “togs”. I cannot live without it. With that said, it does not replace CS5. Going between LR and CS5 is super easy. It is a simple right click within LR “Edit In CS5”. It is almost seamless.
The lack of layering, selection & blend modes in LR3 has been a concern for many of us for years now. Some of the heavy users of LR here may already understand what I am getting at. This has since been resolved this past month with a new plugin put out by OnOne. You should definitely check out OnOne “Perfect Layers” and watch the vid:
http://www.ononesoftware.com/products/suite/perfect-layers/?ind
I have been somewhat impressed with the intuitive layout and ease of use. However, it still targets users that do not have the needs of power CS5 features.In a nutshell, CS5 is irreplaceable in certain areas. For many it is a rough learning curve. I am constantly learning new aspects of CS5 and understanding better ways of doing certain things. All of which speed up my workflow and give me the flexability I need. They both have their places and I love and use both together. It is a perfect fit for me.
John, nice work bud! Those are some fun images. I really like your second one. The golden light on the side of the horse is nice. Your Flower shot is tack!
In regards to feedback, Will pretty much nailed it in his statement
“Nice to see images that get beyond the simple saw this bug took pic stuff.”
Always strive to compose something that is interesting. A good friend of mine this past weekend guides on the Fork in ID. His comment is always “Jay, anyone can make that cast! Hit that little riffle up under that tree near the bank”. The same thing applies with photography.Anyone can take a picture. How will you make yours different? That comes with time, practice, a shit load of patience, and putting in more work. I am continually humbled by how much there is to learn. We have some incredible togs on this site. I don’t say it enough and I sure enjoy the imagery.
HAVE FUN!!! Doug Barnes would constantly remind me of this early on when I first started shooting. It continually sticks with me.
PS. This one is for you Will :}
Both are great camera systems. I think you will be happy with either of them. Go with the one that feels comfortable. Both should be ok with a light mist or rain, this can also be solved with a waterproof bag or rain sleeve when not in use. A lot of people get caught up in the MP game. 10.1mp is more than enough to cover standard print sizes. I am personally not a huge fan of DSLR vid… It is cool, but there are plenty of vid. cameras that will do a much better job. Both camera makers have made vast improvements to video/functionality in their pro-bodies.
Hope this helps:
http://www.jaymorr.com/blog/?page_id=191It should already be very clear to a photographer as to what should be included in their bag along with equipment prep. If it were to become a concern…i have doubts about the photographer shooting the event. The only equipment advice I would give is:
ALWAYS HAVE A BACKUP CAMERA BODY (anything else needed for your wedding shoot)!
Some additional thoughts:
Make sure you have a contract signed
Go through a photo walk through with the bride prior to the shoot. Have clear expectations of what is to be captured
Wedding photography is SERIOUS work. You are capturing imagery that will only be captured once. A wedding tog is being hired for their artistry. Not getting it right can possibly cost you money in litigation. Make sure contracts and expectations are in place. Always carry back up gear and have a plan “B”.
I shot a wedding last summer and during the ring exchange/kiss my camera locked up. I held my hand out and my assistant placed another camera in my hand and I began clicking. I didnt skip a beat. I do not want to think about what would have happened if I were to have botched that moment because of equipment failure. Come to find out afterwards my equipment locked up do to my mistake…. lesson learned. Always be prepared.
After shooting a number of weddings, the real work comes after in post with photo albums and print. It can take some time to figure out how much post production you will need to include in your wedding packages. Not including enough can cost you a small fortune. Including too much can cost you a gig.
Know your market and price competitively.
Learn to understand which clients and opportunities fall within your style of photography.
John, That sounds exciting. DPReview does a great job on their glass reviews.
This is just my own personal experience and take… You may also want to PM John Bennett or some of the other Canon users here on this particular lens.
My personal experience with Tamron has not been great. I have not personally used the lens you are inquiring about. However, for the money I would take a hard look at the Canon 55-250mm IS. I have shot quite a bit with this lens on both an XTi and 40D. You can find the lens usually under 300ish. It is a sharp lens. It also offers Image Stabilization. I lean away from Tamron.
As Corey mentioned…#5 is great. I like it a lot. Nice work.
In photos 1 & 2, the pine tree in front of the angler is distracting. The casting was captured perfectly. The tree in the frame takes away from the shot and subject matter.
Thanks Eric. This is a Callibaetis that presumably came off one of the ponds near my home. This was shot outside just before sun down with an SB900 diffused. 1/250th sync speed.
I get a few bugs my way and hopefully I get some opportunities to shoot more of them on some of my Japanese Maples I have in the yard.
