Zach Matthews

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 6,081 through 6,100 (of 6,660 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Scott G2 or E2 #11453
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Pancho –

    No more than any five weight.

    in reply to: How often do you change flies #11443
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I will say this: not nearly often enough.

    in reply to: Anyone want to organize a fly swap? #55050
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    hahaha.

    in reply to: Redlines #12611
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Solid shots, too, Ian – yours or Taylor’s?  Who post-processed them?  The top one is slow enough that I know someone brought the reds back up, because exposures that long in the Park go green.  Good job both of you.  Your color saturation is excellent on the second and third as well.  None of the brookies I caught had that degree of separation between the colors; they were muddier looking.  Given that the watersheds are actually cut off from each other, I wonder if we were catching separate strains within a mile of each other?

    Hans said the Deep Creek trail requires a “two to three mile hike before you even see fishable water.”  So much for reliable maps, eh?

    You did right to go in early – Hans said there were ten anglers fishing behind him when we turned around, and I had covered about two miles of water at that point without seeing anyone.  That’s what I got for going downstream; a nice hike.  I also jumped a couple grouse – I hike quiet when alone.

    Here’s the same fish shot from the side; notice how the yellow sub-spots on the side are less defined, and how it seems to lack the dual colors of the belly (although you can’t see completely underneath).

    in reply to: Scott G2 or E2 #11449
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Pancho –

    I’d get the G2 and here’s why: both rods will handle the tasks you need them to with no problems.

    in reply to: Dam picture #11438
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Ha!

    in reply to: Walleye on the Fly? #11490
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    MMMM.

    in reply to: confidence patterns #46386
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    San Juan Worms and black wooly buggers.

    in reply to: Shirts are in. #11430
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Greatm thanks Rusty.

    in reply to: Question regarding ISO choices #60450
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Here’s an engineer’s explanation of why the Nikon approach might be better with respect to noise (warning, it is almost unreadably dense):

    http://www.danblanton.com/viewmessage.php?id=63562

    Zach

    in reply to: Vest suggestions #11419
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hahah, whoops, Lauren pointed out it wasn’t MikeA who started the thread at all but Steve154.

    Zach

    in reply to: Vest suggestions #11415
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Lucky –

    Lauren remembers Liz and says she was smart and fun.

    in reply to: Vest suggestions #11413
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Oh, and her parents are Brad and Renee Holt; the Holt and Holt Real Estate office on the old way into town from 412 is her grandparents’ office.

    Zach

    in reply to: Vest suggestions #11412
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hahaha, yes she did.

    in reply to: Vest suggestions #11409
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Steve –

    Do you know the Holts?

    in reply to: Vest suggestions #11407
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Lucky_fly –

    Nice to have you.

    in reply to: Macro/Closeup Lens #60451
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Matt –

    You’re going the wrong direction here.

    in reply to: Question regarding ISO choices #60449
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Thanks Richard.

    in reply to: Sage XP 7wt #11434
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey John –

    Nice to have you.

    in reply to: Question regarding ISO choices #60447
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Richard –

    I am using Photoshop CS2 to convert.  Usually I just drag in the files to an archive hard drive, then import them into Adobe’s Lightroom Beta program, then scan through them and drag them into Photoshop, where I adjust exposure and eventually save in JPEG.  

    My calculations on the D70 are that at 3000×2008 output you only have 10-inches across on a long side.  I published a full page shot in the current issue of American Angler (Ed Engle’s article, facing page, misattributed to my wife, Lauren), that was 11.5 inches on a long side.  Just to get that full page you are already blowing up the image from 6 2/3″ on the short side to 8 1/2″, so we’re talking about more than a 100% enlargement for the two pager.  (Although I could certainly do it with a panorama if I had time to set it all up).

    However your statement that you’ve sold the D2x images in two pages gives me hope, since at 12 megapixels you’re seeing at least a 25% enlargement even with that excellent camera.  (Hmm, wait, on second reading, do I have that right, or are you also limited to one full page as yet?)

    This is as much a problem of convincing my editors that we can break the 300dpi barrier as anything, I expect, and I also know they have good reasons for wanting to keep it as close as possible to that 300 dpi level.  This is why I hope the D3(X, H, whatever) will at least carry 16MP.  That would be two pages at 300dpi out of camera with room for cropping if you needed to with a minor enlargement and a ton of room to crop into a one full page image.

    Zach

Viewing 20 posts - 6,081 through 6,100 (of 6,660 total)