Zach Matthews
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerWow you sure have some colorful bugs in Manitoba!
Hahaha.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey Flatlander –
Welcome.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerThe Jackson Hole area is more or less in Grand Teton National Park.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey that makes a certain amount of sense – swiss straw is sometimes used as shellback and easter packing material.
I’ve seen scud flies that are pink and orange, although I have yet to actually see a scud that color.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerSome kinda issue with the RSS feed, Cameron. I will try to fix it.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerAre you getting episode 4 Cameron?
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerThanks Rusty.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey GS –
I responded in the other thread but just for posterity: per Thom Hogan, it isn’t possible with the remote. You can get someone to stand there and push the trigger, but you can’t do it alone.
Zach
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey GS –
From talking to my editor. I’ve sold them quite a few pictures and I know where I am on this. I need to be able to scan slides in advance to send in *electronic* proofs – it is much faster and most submissions are being handled this way now. Fly Fisherman had me upload my images via FTP, but American Angler and The Drake accepted them via email as well.
Most major magazines want 300 dpi. Multiple 300 dpi by the 17″ by 11″ double truck print size and then divide the results by a million and you have your megapixel count. 16.4 or something is the requirement for an out-of-camera 300 dpi print. Now they don’t actually print in 300dpi (they only need 266) but they still want to see the images in that size to be able to crop as needed.
All of this is actually moot, I’ve talked about it extensively with a couple editors now and a D200 will get the double truck job done – they can enlarge these images enough to satisfy them. The 300dpi thing, like the RAW requirement, is really only in place to discourage mass submissions by amateurs. (My John Wilson shot that ran full-page in this month’s American Angler is a D70 JPEG.)
Also, continuous bursts with the D70 are not, alas, possible.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerMan you guys are killing me.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey Gek –
It’s not a hard fishery up that high, you just have to be careful.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerMike –
In September we are expecting the Nikond D50 to drop into the sub $500 range with a kit lens (which is pretty good).
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey Mike –
Sorry buddy, I got snowed under with work.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey Pancho –
No more than any five weight.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerI will say this: not nearly often enough.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant Anglerhahaha.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerSolid shots, too, Ian – yours or Taylor’s? Who post-processed them? The top one is slow enough that I know someone brought the reds back up, because exposures that long in the Park go green. Good job both of you. Your color saturation is excellent on the second and third as well. None of the brookies I caught had that degree of separation between the colors; they were muddier looking. Given that the watersheds are actually cut off from each other, I wonder if we were catching separate strains within a mile of each other?
Hans said the Deep Creek trail requires a “two to three mile hike before you even see fishable water.” So much for reliable maps, eh?
You did right to go in early – Hans said there were ten anglers fishing behind him when we turned around, and I had covered about two miles of water at that point without seeing anyone. That’s what I got for going downstream; a nice hike. I also jumped a couple grouse – I hike quiet when alone.
Here’s the same fish shot from the side; notice how the yellow sub-spots on the side are less defined, and how it seems to lack the dual colors of the belly (although you can’t see completely underneath).
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey Pancho –
I’d get the G2 and here’s why: both rods will handle the tasks you need them to with no problems.
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHa!
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerMMMM.
-
AuthorPosts