john michael white

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 561 through 580 (of 621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Summer Trip Pt.1 : Elk River #27973

    Gorgeous pics!

    in reply to: Photo Submission to Mags #64076

    Thanks Phil.

    in reply to: What Is This? #64052

    Thanks Scott, that’s good to know!

    in reply to: What Is This? #64050

    Zach,

    Does it matter what type of logo it is?

    in reply to: What Is This? #64049

    Thanks Zach.

    in reply to: What Is This? #64047

    John B.,

    Funny you mention long exposures.  As I was thinking about this late last night after my initial post, I realized that the images I was seeing this in were all images with long exposures 10 – 30 seconds.  So, I think you hit the nail on the head and this is the culprit.  The specs don’t show up as well on my work monitor either, but at home on my calibrated monitor, they are very bright: red or whitish green, and they look like the size of actual pixels.  What can be done, other than a lot of cloning to edit these hotspots out of the image?  Is this charateristic of most digital camera’s when taking long exposures?  Is there anything else I should be doing that will help eliminate this?

    in reply to: Photo Submission to Mags #64074

    This ended up being a really great thread with a wealth of information being provided.

    in reply to: Wife’s first trip #27838

    Ahhh.  I was wondering if that might be it….but it looks a lot like East Tennessee to me.  One of these days, I am going to have to make it up to the LMF.

    I’ve been to Broken Bow once for a weekend retreat back in ’85.

    in reply to: Wife’s first trip #27836

    Nice pictures Dusty.

    in reply to: Alberta Browns #27721

    That made me laugh… ;D

    in reply to: Few vacation shots #64095

    My favorite is the one of the boys sitting by the river.

    in reply to: A day out in central Italy #27673

    Yep.

    in reply to: A little Apache Action #27862

    Thanks Aaron.

    in reply to: A little Apache Action #27860

    I really enjoyed your pictures Aaron.

    in reply to: Fly Photos #64111

    I deleted #6 and #8 after my initial post, while Chad was probably writing his post, becasue I didn’t like them either.

    Thanks for your time and input Chad.

    in reply to: Chasing Stones #27504

    Great pics.

    in reply to: Second hand? #64017

    Having been through this on a limited budget about a year and a half ago, here are my thoughts for what it’s worth.  

    If I had a way to save up and could afford new, I would probably do that…realizing that the latest and greatest that I bought may be obsolete in the next year or two (doesn’t mean its not a great camera, just the technological advances are very rapid these days).  You might be better served buying used, from a reputable source, and this may be a way to get into a nice DSLR that you otherwise couldn’t.  Such was my case.

    I kept putting off the switch from my film SLR until a) I could affford it and b) I felt like the camera technology in my price range was worth it.  At the time, about 1 1/2 years ago, I decided to make the switch and my budget could only afford about $450 for a new body.  I ended up getting a used Canon 10D from the origional owner off of ebay.  It has been a great camera, and was extremely well taken care of…basicaly just like new.  So, if you have good ebay skills at sizing up the seller and the item they are selling, and only buy from people with 100% ratings, you will probably be o.k.  I have heard that you should not buy lenses on ebay because people try to get rid of soft copies there, so I wouldn’t buy a lense there.

    Today, I love my 10D, but as I have progressed, I can appreciate the rapid advancements in digital technology that have come out over the last several years.  My 10 D is now “obsolete” by 3 later models.  I am really wanting to upgrade to the Canon 40D body that has the latest and greatest and is a big improvement, but don’t know that I can afford to anytime in the near future.  But the bottom line is that even thought the 40D would make things “easier”, my 10D still takes great images….I may just have to work a little more and have a little less flexibilty (which is frustrating) but by the same token, that is just the facts at present.  

    You may want to find a good, affordable, DSLR that has a little older technolgy (3-4 years 🙁 ) and see if you enjoy it.  That way you don’t break the bank and come to find out you don’t really use it that much.  Just keep in mind that in a year or two, you may very well want to upgrade.

    in reply to: Canon 40D Upgrade? #64030

    Thanks for the info David.  It sounds like an upgraded body will be well worth the money.  

    in reply to: Stopping down w/ polarizing filter. #64004

    L.R.R., just North of Denton where I grew up!

    in reply to: Stopping down w/ polarizing filter. #64002

    I like the second image a lot better as well.

Viewing 20 posts - 561 through 580 (of 621 total)