Zach Matthews

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1,661 through 1,680 (of 6,660 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Looking for information on San Juan Flies & Video #58552
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Noah –

    Have a look at the post stickied to the main board on how to change your display name over to your real first and last name.

    From what I hear the San Juan is a major scud and sowbug factory too (hence the “San Juan Shuffle”).

    in reply to: Ennis Montana #48874
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    You need to plan on floating most of the water in that area, and it’d be a good time to hire a guide.

    in reply to: Nick Lyons #48866
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Nick was a serious gentleman when I interviewed him for the podcast.

    in reply to: Stocking up for bones and trevs #58562
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Tie some Mini-puffs and some some Squimps too.

    in reply to: Tripletail #48784
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    We got into them today guys, but it took until the wind really got up for us to figure it out and we quickly got blown off the flat.

    in reply to: Multiple use lens #72469
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    If your going to go for the 70-300 L (Ive played with it, like it but imo it has some cons) Id get it, use it on the trip. Then once your home re-evaluate your kit. You can sell it or the 70-200.

    /ps its a brick. Which for me was/is a major drawback. If i want a lens like that (70-300 and slow variable aperture) I want one thats light and small. This is neither

    John, what lens is light and small and would work?

    in reply to: Multiple use lens #72466
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I gota warn you, this forum can give you a bad case of lens lust

    BTW, this is the only fly fishing forum where I drool over the photography.

    In the past I have bought all my cameras, lens, etc. from Adorama.

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Multiple use lens #72464
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    John, thank you. It would be great if you could take several lens and just try them out for a day to see which one you like the best.

    The photos from you and others on the IA forum are outstanding too me. I think you look at photos the way I look at code logic.

    I think the 70-300 L IS is the way for me to go, which means I will probably sell my Canon 70-200 F4 lens to gain the extra 100 and take along my Canon 24mm 2.8 lens for wide landscape shots.

    BTW, here was our night sky last night with thunderstorms rolling through. Really wicked looking clouds right at dark. Since it was starting to rain I didn’t dare use my tripod.


    Night Sky by Wiflyfisher, on Flickr

    in reply to: Multiple use lens #72462
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Thank you all for your input. After reading the replies I think you guys have much higher expectations than many amateurs like me. I look at the reviews on Adorama and they are all positive and their photos look fine too me… http://www.adorama.com/CA70300ISNU.html

    I have spent time analyzing what photos I will be taking throughout the trip to YNP, MT and SD. I can see closeups, landscape and wildlife all in the same short time frame. My thinking is I would rather try the shot then miss out, especially for my wife and kids sake.

    I am now pretty sure the Canon 70-300 will be my choice.

    Update: Why is Canon 70-300 L-lens $1000 more? Is the “L” version worth the extra monies?

    Thanks again for all your input.

    John

    in reply to: New Video: How to Tie the Zach’s Sack #58535
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Keith –

    It really does wind up being cheaper than two part epoxy because of the minimal wastage.

    in reply to: Multiple use lens #72459
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Thank you for your insights. I do have one Tamron lens that orginally came with the Canon XTi but I have never liked it’s results so I never use it.

    I was also considering the “Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Autofocus Telephoto Zoom Lens”. I just wish it included the macro settings for real close ups when fishing. Otherwise, I guess I might carry my Point-and-click camera for macros and possible movies. That is what I did last year while on the Henry’s Fork.

    I will have my family with me out West this year and one day I am taking them on a day long trail ride into YNP with just us and a guide. I am hoping to take my Canon XTi along, if I can figure out how to carry it on the horse.

    in reply to: Hair Extensions are Stealing all of our Feathers #48761
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I haven’t been in a shop in awhile.  If saddle hackle is pretty much history, what’s up with necks?

    Are necks still around?

    I am being told quality griz capes and the such are also starting to get scooped up because of the shortage of saddles in the popular dyed griz colors. Check out ebay and you will see a lot of shorter feathers being sold in small bundles. There is a lot I can’t say, I just hope this crazy fade end soons. Hopefully, most of you have a lifetime supply of feathers you need for dry flies and such.

    Update: Henry Hoffman on the feather craze… http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20110606/BLOG50/110609874/1004/sports

    BTW, I know some shops that have pulled their capes and don’t allow feather ladies to buy them.

    in reply to: Hair Extensions are Stealing all of our Feathers #48759
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Necks are still available.

    in reply to: Stonefly husks? #48731
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Those are definitely stonefly husks, and yes, Steven also has it right.

    Zach

    in reply to: Tripletail #48779
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Bob –

    Got any recommendations on a specific shrimp pattern to pick up?

    Zach

    in reply to: Atlanta driving advice #48946
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Mark –

    If you’re headed down I-75 to go to Florida, yes, the best way to go through the city is to stay in the HOV lane on the far left side of the road.

    in reply to: Michigan #48771
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Dave –

    Just for perspective, not to knock your local water, but I have participated in a mass gar gigging in which we killed at least a dozen over 20 lbs. out of the 127 we killed in one night.  (This was a one-time thing for me; gigging is highly wasteful).  The largest one was 26 lbs. and change–I remember because it was just under the 27 lb. state record, which is a line record naturally.  That fish was easily five feet long.

    I found a photo of a longnose which was also 26 lbs. (this guy was not with our group):

    They stay long, obviously, but they also thick up a lot.

    Zach

    in reply to: Michigan #48769
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    That is one skinny gar, even for a longnose.

    in reply to: Hair Extensions are Stealing all of our Feathers #48752
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Eric –

    I had the same questions.

    in reply to: Hair Extensions are Stealing all of our Feathers #48740
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    KBilcher –

    Believe it or not, both Simms and Scott have told me 2010 was one of their best years on record.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,661 through 1,680 (of 6,660 total)