Zach Matthews

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 3,621 through 3,640 (of 6,660 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cheapest way to shoot BW and get it converted? #64749
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Thanks everyone, very much.

    in reply to: Nikon to announce 41mp MX sensor in FEB? #64715
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Agree with Morsie here.  48MP is astronomical.  My iMac is loaded with the full 3GB of RAM it can take; it’s a 2.1Ghz processor.  It can barely run Lightroom with 10MP RAW images (of course, I have about 30,000 of them in the archive).  You’d flat need a Mac Pro tower (minimum $4k with monitor, and that’s not much of an improvement over what I have – you’d need to spend $6k right now to get in the ballpark).  Ouch.

    Also, my interpretation is a little different.  Nikon is due for a D3x.  Most people expect it to have range in the 20-25MP area.  That would meet the qualifications on that ad.

    I certainly think Nikon needs to release its next high-res pro flagship before going to medium format, especially since they currently have four (4!) 12MP cameras on the market (D90, D300, D700, D3) with more out there (D2x) in the used arena.  Canon has a flagship that can make a print big enough to fit the side of a bus.  

    Zach

    PS If Nikon goes to a digital rangefinder, that would be great too, but I’d rather see it stay in the DX range and focus on being portable and quiet.  All rumors of the old F3D prototype that supposedly was out there seem to have died, but how cool would it be to have access to all of Nikon’s manual lenses with a digital back?  They could just sell the back door for the existing F3s.

    in reply to: What rod to get? #29980
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I’d be surprised if the discount extends to bamboo, or is as deep if it does.

    You’re in a great position and many people on this board would envy you.

    in reply to: New Sage and Rio Products. #28940
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Yes David, actually 3 of them.

    in reply to: Podcast: Patagonia’s Bill Klyn on Giving Back #28888
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Try refreshing – it may be a faulty server on my end.

    in reply to: Drift Boat Chine Repair #28947
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    $1800.

    in reply to: Drift Boat Chine Repair #28944
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Matt –

    I recall hearing somewhere that Line-X and Rhino-liner have different levels of “stickiness.”

    in reply to: Help me learn to love this fly. #28895
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Abe –

    The Clinch has its fair share of stocker trout, and theoretically they should hit woolies, but TWRA usually stocks in there at 4″.  By the time those fish hit 12″, they have seen an enormous number of olive woolly buggers, mostly fished poorly.

    Woollies are fished best like most streamers; on the swing, over a drop-off or through a channel.  If you are simply casting them in shallow shoaling water like at Miller Island, you’re not going to do as well.  I would go down below the Weir Dam to the very end of the island and wade out on the rock ledges, and cast across and down.

    But the truth is, the woolly is not the most productive fly on the Clinch and never will be.  You are 100% right to be using little zebra midges in there.  If you must fish a streamer, I would throw a Zuddler Minnow.  Most of Scott Rogers’ crew’s biggest fish came on that fly, which they called “whitey,” being thrown most likely on sinking or sink-tip lines at rising water, out of boats.

    If you really want to use a woolly to catch a fish, my advice would be to go down to the Anderson County jail and cast them across and down in the area upstream where the river cuts through those little rock ledges.  Be the only one there, and stay far enough back that the fish can’t see you on top of them.

    Zach

    in reply to: New Sage and Rio Products. #28937
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Michael –

    Let me ask you to hold off for now.

    in reply to: Low light question #64521
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Shew, Buzz.

    in reply to: Fly in the Ointment #64489
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Good shot Neal.

    in reply to: Another Pigmy Rattlesnake #64555
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Pretty bellycrawler.

    Zach

    in reply to: Back Up the Mountain #28814
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Different location altogether, Neal.

    Zach

    in reply to: Low light question #64517
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I’ve had some PMs and emails, so here’s another analogy.

    Say a given shot is metered properly at f/8 and 1/125th.

    Now add a polarizing filter with two stops of darkening to the front of the lens.

    in reply to: Low light question #64516
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I don’t think so, Will.

    in reply to: Low light question #64513
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Buzz –

    Yes, I am saying that, but I better explain.

    in reply to: Aaron’s Article #64478
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Ditto what John said Aaron. Good work, interesting read.

    in reply to: Stupid questions on bamboo #28775
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Abe –

    Bamboo is an enormous world.

    in reply to: Your thoughts? #64463
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    My main concern is that the size of the fly means you’re losing detail.

    in reply to: D90 is Here! #64449
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    D90 is a consumer camera, don’t doubt it.

Viewing 20 posts - 3,621 through 3,640 (of 6,660 total)