anonymous
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
anonymous
MemberThanks John and Zach
You both answered a badly asked question
May 3, 2009 at 6:21 pm in reply to: Bokeh: No Skill Or Expensive Lens Required Just Buy This Plugin! #67570anonymous
MemberConvenient perhaps but certainly not as nice on the transitions. The blur looks digitally done.
anonymous
MemberThanks John 🙂
David-
anonymous
MemberVery nice peice Corey- well deserved
anonymous
MemberWhoa! How many times has someone started on about  😮
“The good old days” Â ::)
Hope this isn’t too cheesy  :-[ but…It happened to me again last night and I had to pull the last remaining hair out just before I went into a diatribe about…
These ARE the good old days!!!!
Not cheesy, just Carly Simon, Simon. On second thought, maybe it is cheesy :-).
anonymous
MemberTy for the eyes – much appreciated
Rig is a
anonymous
MemberDarn even more more confirmation- Jose- my wife- is right-
Apr 30, 2009 at 3:50 pm in reply to: Billy the Kid, Mogollon Cliff Dwellings & Gilas: My weekend #35626anonymous
MemberFantastic Aaron.
anonymous
MemberLove the bend in the river shot as well, John. Those always work well.
All the best with the surgery,
Scott
anonymous
MemberLovely
anonymous
MemberGees Mike and Morsie- give Phil a break :)))) North Americans
anonymous
MemberGreat pics!
Good luck with everything!
anonymous
MemberMy friend has the 9′ 5wt Z.
anonymous
Memberanonymous
MemberBrett,
Don’t let my advice discourage you.
anonymous
MemberBrett,
I’m very new to this so I’ll tell you what I did for my first purchase.  I could only afford one good(not incredible) lens so I went with the Nikon 18-200.  Being a rookie I figure it is capable of doing most everything I would need at my current skill level.  Unfortunately, it hasn’t been out fishing yet, mostly just around town and at home.  I’m very happy with it so far.  I also bought the 50mm 1.8.  I bought the 50 for taking a lot of portraits of my daughter.  I know its not the best portrait lens out there, but it is a lot of bang for the buck IMO and I really like the lens.  I’ve used these two for about 4 months now and feel very comfortable that they were good purchases for starting out.  That being said, I envy anyone with a 70-200 2.8  😉 and would love to have a Tokina 11-16 2.8 as an ultra wide.  The 50mm 1.8 has showed me how great fast lenses are, which has pointed out some of the weaknesses of the 18-200.  Unfortunately for me the 70-200 2.8 won’t be in the budget for a long time, but the Tokina may be with a birthday approaching. Â
Heres a few results from the 50mm 1.8. Â I know you can look at some of Neal Osborn’s stuff if you want to see some good results from the 18-200. Â I probably have more stuff right now that would show the shortcomings of the 18-200 than how good it is, but thats because I often try to use it for things it can’t do well(stopping fast action), which is my fault not the lens’.
anonymous
MemberI really have to get a sound card
anonymous
MemberZach, if you haven’t seen this, you might get a kick out of Lee Wulff’s guide poling the canoe around.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q6-6A3vCpo
Being in Canada, I suspect he used spruce. Down here you might have to try poplar or ash.
Be sure to watch the second part also.
Scott
anonymous
MemberI’ve seen the same “breaching” behaviour up here even well past spawning time . I’ve often wondered if they were trying to rid themselves of
anonymous
MemberWinter reads-
Caddisflies – Lafontaine – for the umpteeenth time
Border River Angling – W.H Lawrie
Scottish Trout Flies- W.H. Lawrie
English Trout Flies- W.H. Lawrie
Clyde Style Flies- John Reid
Wheatgrass
-
AuthorPosts