Douglas Barnes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 338 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Somewhere over the rainbow ( a pic heavy essay) #72843

    Dig your work John! Thanks for posting!

    db

    in reply to: Words of wisdom on PacNW Chrome #49786

    You should really ask a local. My buddy Steve Buckner is quite the guru and can steer you in the right direction. He lives there. Call him:

    http://www.northwestflyfisherman.com/

    Good luck and be sure to post some pics.

    db

    in reply to: Klamath Falls here I come… #49602

    Thanks Tim! I called and talked to Randy who in turn is trying to connect us with Chris. He sounded enthusiastic. This could be good!

    db

    in reply to: Miami Peacocks and more #49616

    Great stuff as usual Cor. I really like that ‘game changer’ shot the mostest!!!

    db

    in reply to: Great Smoky Mountains National Park Photo Essay #72747

    Thanks for sharing, solid trip report! Especially fond of the second image!

    in reply to: Filters for outdoor in bright sunlight? #72710

    .. I do always keep one with with me as well as a few ND’s, and one gnd plate…

    Good point! Always bring ’em along, (even if not permanently attached). Filters and filter brackets are light and small compared to other non mandatory equipment. Plus, they can make a big difference when least expected.

    🙂

    in reply to: Filters for outdoor in bright sunlight? #72708

    Call me crazy (or simply the Devil’s advocate) but I only use filters when I absolutely need them, especially polarizers. The 2+ stop penalty combined with the contrast robbing results of extra glass layers make me think twice about leaving it on full time. Sure, I’ll screw one on when its raining & I want to reduce reflections perhaps, or other times to increase shutter speed/aperture for creative effect, etc (like John Bennet’s excellent example above). Once in a while I’ll use a ND grad (or two) when a little evening-out is required. But only then, really. Outdoor photographer guru Thom Hogan (who rarely uses them) writes: “Filters always rob a bit of light (and in some cases, a lot of light), increase flare tendencies, and add to your equipment cost…”

    My advise John S. is to use them but do so selectively, carefully, and ALWAYS use a lens hood. As you know, no amount of filters will turn mid day sun into golden hour light.

    my 2cents.

    db

    in reply to: Nikon D400 #72603

    Curtis, what I meant is @ 85,000 captures in a starting role my D700 has seen a lot of playing time and will have to come in off the bench soon. When I take them to 125k, it’s time to retire them and that’s when I re-up. But you’re right, it’s a fantastic tool and the first camera I grab on any assignment. Especially for people or if it’s going to be a long day (the viewfinder is sooooooo much bigger and better on full frame which make a huge difference after putting up to your eye 1000 times).

    Zach, I agree with you about the grip and hope they stay with a removable one on the D400/800. I believe they will. Having the option to go small when when you want to save weight, then the ability to slap on a grip when you want comfortable vertical shooting or more horsepower is cool. Plus, the same grip works on both the 300 and 700. Hopefully they’ll do that again too! And yes, the F100 was legendary! I never had one (the last 35mm film bodies I owned were D90s’s) but a buddy of mine did. Solid!

    in reply to: Nikon D400 #72599

    I’m thinking 21mp for the D400, and the D800 going 24mp. My D700 is in it’s Autumn years so I’ll prolly get the new full frame (D800) if it’s got a Nikon’s sensor.

    Zach, do you ever read Thom Hogan’s stuff? He’s got some great commentary on the subject.

    db

    in reply to: Are fly fishing companies price gouging on backing #49340

    Dave,
      What is dry shake actually containing? ..
    Eric

    Eric, it’s fumed silica epoxy. Mostly used as a thickener for marine use adhesives etc. $6 buys you a lifetime supply. I bought mine six or so yrs ago and haven’t made a dent. Link:

    http://www.epoxyproducts.com/2_fillers.html

    technically it is not epoxy.

    It is fumed silica.  

    Ah, thanks Dave!

    Either way, it comes in a plastic bag so the hard part is getting the stuff out of the bag and into a jar without turning your house into a Superfund site…lol.

    Sorry for the hijack fellas..

    in reply to: Are fly fishing companies price gouging on backing #49337

    Dave,
      What is dry shake actually containing? ..
    Eric

    Eric, it’s fumed silica epoxy. Mostly used as a thickener for marine use adhesives etc. $6 buys you a lifetime supply. I bought mine six or so yrs ago and haven’t made a dent. Link:

    http://www.epoxyproducts.com/2_fillers.html

    in reply to: Waterproof Camera Pouch #72591

    …  You should be able to pick up a decent roll top dry bag in any outdoors store.  Simms makes a nice one too, but pretty pricey for what it is: http://www.simmsfishing.com/site/dry_creek_camera_bag_09.html#.
    ….

    Tim, I have that exact bag and its great for my LX3. (I agree, too exp- although I picked mine up on the last day of the Outdoor Retailers show a few yrs ago for free..=). Has padding inside as well-BTW. Pretty sweet! I simply put it on my waist belt (if wearing waders), or on the hip belt/strap of my WJ Exodus pack during summer. Lightweight, handy, waterproof. Perfect!

    in reply to: S. Pacific Bonefish Extravaganza: TR / Photo essay #49249

    Holy shee-ite! Fantastic TR! Those bones are huge! Great stuff Tim and thanks for taking the time to write and post this. I’ll be coming back again to drool, often… 😛

    in reply to: Nikon dream team #72539

    As to your question, I wouldn’t recommend the Nikkor 18-200VR. I owned (the old version) and wasn’t too impressed with it’s sharpness, focus speed, or build. However, the new one’s supposed to be better.

    May I suggest Nikkors 16-85mm-VR and 70-300mm-VR for your new DX body. I have them both and they constantly amaze me. Sharp as hell. Sturdy yet light. Only $600-700 each. Toss in a Nikkor 12-24mm and/or a fast 85mm prime and you’ve got yourself a good range. You can pick up some close focus filters if you want to get all macro’d up (for a lot less than buying a macro lens, link below). This set up is what I take fishing and my Nikkor 14-24mm/24-70mm/80-200mm 2.8’s (read-heavy and expensive) are reserved for architecture/indoor/studio stuff.

    http://www.pictureline.com/lenses/hoya/close-up-filter-sets.html

    Hope this helps.

    db

    http://www.nowpicturethis.com

    Paul, Sorry to learn of your theft, BTW. >:(

    in reply to: Nikon dream team #72538

    Good advise so far. I just wanted to throw in Thom Hogan’s link while we’re looking at online opinion blogs. He’s a Nikon guy with great info and lots of real world experience. Bonus, he doesn’t include as much hyperbole or reviews of 20yr old equipment… 😉

    http://www.bythom.com/

    I check it once a week at least.

    db

    in reply to: Mexico:Palometa Club:19 Permit #49024

    Nice work Matt! Looks like a great place!

    in reply to: Alone in the Mountains #48434

    Good stuff Neal! Thanks for posting!

    in reply to: New boats #48410

    Gorgeous! That wood really looks fine against the green grass.

    Looking forward to the wet shots.

    db

    in reply to: Hwy1 Road Trip Pics #72405

    Nice work Cor! Looks like you guys had a good time.

    in reply to: Gheenoe #48287

    Nice! I really like the 1st shot of the second set Andrew. Big fan of shooting from lowwww! Colorful fish too!

    db

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 338 total)