Buzz Bryson
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Buzz Bryson
MemberDid I mention that the pro lab here in the Raleigh area has cut way back on E-6 processing?
Buzz Bryson
MemberPMA show starts March 7.
Buzz Bryson
MemberThe F3 is a classic film camera.
Buzz Bryson
MemberBeen there once (last year); going again this year.
Buzz Bryson
MemberTried the served loop, and the double nail knot loop.
Buzz Bryson
MemberHaven’t used it myself.
Buzz Bryson
MemberThat Castwell knot sure looks like a sheet bend to me.
Buzz Bryson
MemberStart saving.
Problem is pixels.
Buzz Bryson
MemberI think the first question you need to ask is what is, or might be, the ultimate use of the scanned images.
Buzz Bryson
MemberIan,
Commercial version is at http://www.flytubez.com/.
They were at trade show last year, or year before.
Buzz Bryson
MemberMy experience has been a bit different. I’ve had 2-3 magazines, after I respond to querys with the requested low-res jpegs, specifically ask for raw files. I asked if they really meant the NEF files and they said yes. At other times, the same magazines said jpegs were fine. Some were used double truck, some column width. Depends on what they’re doing, and the skills of the production folks, I reckon. At least one of them I deal with has an in-office printer that duplicates (so they tell me) what comes off the out-of-house production line, so that if they have any question about final quality, they can print hard copy to view how photo will appear in magazine.
One magazine, as recently as a couple of years ago, didn’t want to take digital, but wanted a couple of photos I had, so asked me to print them “large size”. I took them a 13×19 print (that from a D100, 6mp), and said great, and bought the photos. As far as I know, they now take digital regularly, as long as file size is large enough, and they don’t care whether it’s raw or jpeg.
Buzz
Buzz Bryson
MemberZach,
Was at the dreaded mall today, and stuck head into Wolf Camera. They had a lightweight tripod and ball head for $59.95. Might actually work for what you’re wanting.
Buzz Bryson
MemberDang Zach,
Don’t you know that putting “photo” in front of anything adds at least $100 to the price? And you only want to spend $100!
I think, though, you probably have about the best you can get for the bucks. Gitzo and others, of course, have some really nice lightweight tripods in graphite and basalt, like the G-1298 (3+ lbs), and Really Right Stuff has that cute little BH-25 ball head (< 1/2 lb). And you'd only be out, for the pair, about $550. Oh yes, the RRS plates for your body are about $50 too, so say $600. On a more serious note, we used to take those standard 1/4″-20 bolts and attach them to all sorts of things to make camera mounts. Add a cheap, small, ball head, and you can attach a camera in all sorts of places. Braze one or two of the bolts onto a Vise-Grip and you can clamp it to about anything you can get the jaws around – – – a pipe, tree limb, chair arm/leg, etc. Attach one to a lag screw, and you can screw it into a tree. Put one on a walking staff with a sharp tip and jam it into the ground (usually you can see those slowly start to tip over and watch your camera drop to the ground). All of the above makes one appreciate the Bogen value prices even more. Buzz
Buzz Bryson
MemberTed is an excellent writer (probably comes from being a great angler, fly tier, and all-round great guy.
Buzz Bryson
MemberThe Charlton is supposedly (and I sure agree) self-adjusting.
Buzz Bryson
MemberThe 300 f/4 is a great lens.
Buzz Bryson
MemberRandom thoughts:
Demands of and on fly reels are of course related to their intended usage.
Buzz Bryson
MemberZach is correct, in that raw files are better-suited to getting the absolute maximum amount of information out of a file.
Buzz Bryson
MemberYes, Canon has Canon Professional Services.
Buzz Bryson
MemberDaggone!
-
AuthorPosts