Buzz Bryson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 217 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F3 in working order #61085
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Did I mention that the pro lab here in the Raleigh area has cut way back on E-6 processing?

    in reply to: Here’s something interesting #61081
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    PMA show starts March 7.

    in reply to: Rumors of New Nikon Cameras #61009
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    The F3 is a classic film camera.

    in reply to: Suggestions for Baja, Mexico #15224
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Been there once (last year); going again this year.

    in reply to: Maxima Pound Test… #15116
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Tried the served loop, and the double nail knot loop.

    in reply to: Maxima Pound Test… #15110
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Haven’t used it myself.

    in reply to: Maxima Pound Test… #15108
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    That Castwell knot sure looks like a sheet bend to me.

    in reply to: Lens or Crop?? #60956
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Start saving.

    Problem is pixels.

    in reply to: 35MM Slides #60953
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    I think the first question you need to ask is what is, or might be, the ultimate use of the scanned images.

    in reply to: Stripping mat #15030
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Ian,

    Commercial version is at http://www.flytubez.com/.

    They were at trade show last year, or year before.

    in reply to: RAW files #60913
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    My experience has been a bit different.  I’ve had 2-3 magazines, after I respond to querys with the requested low-res jpegs, specifically ask for raw files.  I asked if they really meant the NEF files and they said yes.  At other times, the same magazines said jpegs were fine.  Some were used double truck, some column width.  Depends on what they’re doing, and the skills of the production folks, I reckon.   At least one of them I deal with has an in-office printer that duplicates (so they tell me) what comes off the out-of-house production line, so that if they have any question about final quality, they can print hard copy to view how photo will appear in magazine.

    One magazine, as recently as a couple of years ago, didn’t want to take digital, but wanted a couple of photos I had, so asked me to print them “large size”.  I took them a 13×19 print (that from a D100, 6mp), and said great, and bought the photos.  As far as I know, they now take digital regularly, as long as file size is large enough, and they don’t care whether it’s raw or jpeg.

    Buzz

    in reply to: Hiking Tripod #61204
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Zach,

    Was at the dreaded mall today, and stuck head into Wolf Camera.  They had a lightweight tripod and ball head for $59.95.  Might actually work for what you’re wanting.

    in reply to: Hiking Tripod #61203
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Dang Zach,

    Don’t you know that putting “photo” in front of anything adds at least $100 to the price?  And you only want to spend $100!

    I think, though, you probably have about the best you can get for the bucks.  Gitzo and others, of course, have some really nice lightweight tripods in graphite and basalt, like the G-1298 (3+ lbs), and Really Right Stuff has that cute little BH-25 ball head (< 1/2 lb).  And you'd only be out, for the pair, about $550.  Oh yes, the RRS plates for your body are about $50 too, so say $600. On a more serious note, we used to take those standard 1/4″-20 bolts and attach them to all sorts of things to make camera mounts.  Add a cheap, small, ball head, and you can attach a camera in all sorts of places.  Braze one or two of the bolts onto a Vise-Grip and you can clamp it to about anything you can get the jaws around – – – a pipe, tree limb, chair arm/leg, etc.  Attach one to a lag screw, and you can screw it into a tree.  Put one on a walking staff with a sharp tip and jam it into the ground (usually you can see those slowly start to tip over and watch your camera drop to the ground).   All of the above makes one appreciate the Bogen value prices even more. Buzz

    in reply to: Leeson and Schollmeyer’s new book #55317
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Ted is an excellent writer (probably comes from being a great angler, fly tier, and all-round great guy.

    in reply to: Reels #14964
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    The Charlton is supposedly (and I sure agree) self-adjusting.

    in reply to: Nikkor 300mm f4.0 AF for wildlife? #60941
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    The 300 f/4 is a great lens.

    in reply to: Reels #14960
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Random thoughts:

    Demands of and on fly reels are of course related to their intended usage.

    in reply to: RAW files #60902
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Zach is correct, in that raw files are better-suited to getting the absolute maximum amount of information out of a file.

    in reply to: 18-70mm Damaged #60932
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Yes, Canon has Canon Professional Services.

    in reply to: ballpark value of old Sage rod…. #14621
    Buzz Bryson
    Member

    Daggone!

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 217 total)