Zach Matthews

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 3,761 through 3,780 (of 6,660 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Met up w/ an IA buddy and did a little fishing #27531
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I thought I spotted a little desert camo on the hat there.

    in reply to: FISHING LUGGAGE #27518
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    For luggage, old fashioned non-lightweight rugged materials like leather, real rubber, and canvas will always beat new back-pack style materials.

    in reply to: 2008 New Gear #27540
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    David –

    I suspect that’s going to be a sentiment that just about every angler feels like expressing in 2009, and I am sure it has the manufacturers terrified.

    Zach

    in reply to: My first carp on a fly. #27734
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Best on-the-water memory from teenage years was floating the Buffalo at about age 13 with my cousin in the canoe.

    in reply to: And it Was GOOD #27583
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Excellent post and what a great trip!

    in reply to: Gulf of Mexico #27632
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Shew.  We kinda got whacked by Hurricane Dolly yesterday, believe it or not.  We still had an amazing time. Our guide, with the unforgettable name Baz Yelverton, proved to be a total professional with a few aces up his sleeve.

    We started out in Pensacola Bay and ran out to see if we could get into the Gulf.  No go; the breakers were hammering the surf and turning over 1/4 mile out.  There was probably a six foot swell at 8:00 AM with no wind, all pushed up by the lobes of Dolly sitting offshore.  

    However, Baz still anchored up on a sandbar and we had some ho-hum ladyfish action.  I was kinda wondering what he was doing (other than checking his sports’ casting, which is always smart).  Suddenly I hear a sccccreeeeeaaaacccchhhhhhh across the sky like the blue’s just been torn asunder and the friggin Blue Angels come ripping over us in formation.  They hold practices on the bay right there at that time of day!  We watched an entire air show; F-14s flown upside down, at one point a pilot came right over our head at near stall speed and we all waved.  I swear he was not 100 feet off the ground.  Those guys are flat out astounding.  

    I probably should have shot pictures but the boat was heaving pretty good and my gear was fogged from being the A/C in the car on the drive over (it was hot and humid).  Still I did record an audio, which may make it into a future podcast.

    So after that extremely sweet bonus (earned his tip right there in my book), we proceeded up into the bay and set up for sharks (which we were targeting since the albacore were out in the heaving gulf).  This was agreed beforehand and in no way a cop-out by Baz; I wanted to try to catch a shark on the fly.

    Baz put us right by a multi-million dollar mansion on a point and we proceeded to have shot after shot at cruising blacktips.  I had follows and swirls on poppers but no bites, but Jake Campbell, my cousin, who was fishing with us as a birthday present, stuck about a 60 pounder.  Holy. Crap.

    That fish ran him over 200 yards into his backing on a heavy 10 weight RPLXi.  Finally it just sawed through the Tyger Wire; nothing to do, couldn’t budge him.  We did get some pictures of the fight, which lasted about five minutes.  Very, very cool.

    Unfortunately, conditions went south pretty quick after that.  The “afternoon” wind started at 10 AM and pretty soon I was the only one left in the boat who could really still cast, and not that well at that.  We switched to sinking shooting lines to cut through the gale but the bay was white-capping everywhere.  So we ran up in the lee, way, way up about 10 miles into the East River looking for bait and jacks.

    We did find the bait and we did manage to cast to it for quite a while.  Baz did a great job of setting us up to drift through the menhaden.  With the wind howling, I had the dubious satisfaction of seeing the backing knot on my shooting line, but of course all I really had to do was huck it up there and let it sail.

    Finally we determined that the bait wasn’t holding any predators other than us, so we went back to the shark point and had a few more follows.  I had an epic chase all the way to the boat by a small, landable blacktip (probably 30 pounds), but unfortunately he spooked off when he got within about 30 feet.  Chased a little black clouser of all things.

    We had a great time despite basically getting blanked (ladyfish notwithstanding).  Blue Angels, sticking a shark that big and seeing the fight, and knowing that there was nothing whatsoever Baz could do about wind and hurricanes.  I would happily recommend Baz again (Gulf Breeze Guide Service).  Total professional in every way, and you know I’ve seen the flip side.

    But, alas, my Gulf of Mexico streak of bad luck seems to have held in terms of actually catching fish.  Still, for a no-fish day, this is as good as it gets.

    Zach

    in reply to: Met up w/ an IA buddy and did a little fishing #27527
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Nice!

    in reply to: Stopping down w/ polarizing filter. #64001
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Dusty, I like the second image better. I think you are right that the log took up too much room and kind of drew your eye away from the angler. Looks like some fun carping!

    in reply to: Johnny’s BIG Day #27474
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Solid.

    in reply to: It’s on now #28350
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    So you waded for that?!

    in reply to: Gulf of Mexico #27630
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Not too shabby so far, gents.

    in reply to: 2008 New Gear #27534
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    We’ll see what happens at the Fly Fishing Retailer Show (which I am covering again for American Angler).

    in reply to: Where Flies are Made #27612
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Tim –

    The #1 factor in why no one has done an outsourcing article yet is cost.  The magazines’ travel budget was never much and nowadays is pretty much nil.  That means (assuming I wrote it for AA), we’d have to have a sponsor to get us to the factories, and since the sponsor would be a manufacturer, that would raise a potential conflict of interest.  Plus, what manufacturer would be served enough to pay a writer thousands of dollars (the cost of a ticket to SE Asia plus lodging) to come out and maybe just confirm what the manufacturer has been saying all along?  I mean, I see that as a big positive for the manufacturer but I am not sure they would.

    Zach

    in reply to: Where Flies are Made #27611
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    That is a really excellent, informative post.

    in reply to: Gulf of Mexico #27624
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    A waterproof camera pack company had offered me a demo pack to go try out but they never came through.

    in reply to: Where Flies are Made #27598
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Depends on whether it was an expose or not.

    in reply to: Where Flies are Made #27596
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    No clue who these flies are being tied for; could be high-end commercial or low end shop flies.

    in reply to: Swimming Sideways #56161
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Are you using offset hooks?

    Zach

    in reply to: Swimming Sideways #56157
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    What knot are you using?

    in reply to: Worst fishing day ever #27450
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Andrew –

    Don’t try to read too much into the citations; this was written for lawyers by a lawyer.  (Ga. 1997) means the Supreme Court of Georgia handed down the ruling in 1997.  The Supreme Court is the highest court in almost every state (except New York) and is likewise the highest court in Georgia.  This means that all lower courts in Georgia will be bound by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the law.  If you want to change it, you have to either convince the Legislature to re-write it or convince the Supreme Court to revisit its own interpretation on appeal (not likely).

    The statute in question was actually penned in 1863, although it has been recodified without substantial change a couple times.  What this means in lay terms is that “navigability” of a river is the key.  If the river is navigable, the public can fish it.  If the river is not navigable, landowners can post it, if they want to.  

    The term “navigable stream” is defined in the statute as “a stream which is capable of transporting boats loaded with freight in the regular course of trade either for the whole or a part of the year.”  The challenge in the Givens case was what this language meant: what was “freight?”  What is the “regular course of trade?”  Was the “regular course of trade” defined by an 1863 standard or a 1997 (i.e. the present) standard?

    The Court held the standard was the present commercial freight standard.  That’s why they used a big old barge as the definition of “regular course of trade.”  By interpreting the law to mean current freight standards, the court drastically limited the number of rivers in Georgia which could be defined as navigable.  Obviously, had the court accepted the 19th century standard, with the bale of cotton and the goat as “freight,” then we’d have a whole lot more navigable rivers in Georgia.

    What that means is that we all need to pay attention to landowners.  Watch them to make sure they aren’t being agitated, and if they do get agitated, pay attention if they start to organize.  Most landowners are not aware of the current state of the law; they tend to cite their deeds, which actually have no impact if they are in contravention of the Court’s current interpretation (that means a court today would just throw out the part of any deed claiming to give title to a “navigable” streambed to a landowner).  

    The best way to handle this is to work with landowners rather than against them and leave the law alone.  Most landowners just want their property to remain clean and quiet and undisturbed.  If you see anglers abusing that relationship, you might mention that the landowner doesn’t have to let you fish on the property (at least on the Toccoa) and thus it’s better to behave.  On the other hand, don’t go telling your landowner buddies that they can post the property!  No sense waking up a sleeping tiger.

    Zach

Viewing 20 posts - 3,761 through 3,780 (of 6,660 total)