anonymous

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1,741 through 1,760 (of 2,558 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Panorama Stitching Software #63970
    anonymous
    Member

    Travis, the software that comes with your DSLR may have a panorama stitching program. If not, Adobe Photoshop Elements can do it and it costs around $100.

    in reply to: Lighting question #63938
    anonymous
    Member

    David – I see your logic there – I’ll give that a whirl.

    John-

    in reply to: Whatcha been reading lately? #48059
    anonymous
    Member

    Cameron,
    You’re right about Urenech’s book.

    in reply to: A Trip Home To Michigan #27418
    anonymous
    Member

    Have to second David, Cameron. I always enjoy your photo essays/trip reports. What great memories.

    in reply to: Orvis T3’s? #27208
    anonymous
    Member

    All of them are good rods, mind the TLS.

    The TLS’s make decent client rods in the mid flex range. IMHO, they were much better rods when they were in the Trident TLS series…..and even better when they were just Tridents.

    The T3’s are great rods, durable and accurate with a fairly light feel. Real work horses in the boat. They really take a beating as boat rods but the T3’s hold up well. Only complaint is the uplocking butt cap will loosen from time to time. You really want these in a mid fles as well, unless your primary concern is streamer fishing (real streamer fishing and not swinging buggers).

    The zero g’s are just bad to the bone. Again, mid flex is the key. Very light, fairly durable (not up to the T3’s though). Beautiful rods and a pleasure to fish. Not really a client stick though. A little too pricey of a rod for the common client (as they are much more abusive to equipment than more advanced anglers).

    Hope this helps.

    T

    in reply to: 50 MegaPixel hasselblad – suprisingly affordable! #63930
    anonymous
    Member

    David K- I thought the idea was Pro’s simply made images the rest of us could’nt and that was why we should hire them and very rightly and appropriately and in many cases so!!!! .

    in reply to: Cicada Slurping Smallies #27089
    anonymous
    Member

    Very nice!

    in reply to: Helios 8’4 3wt? #27048
    anonymous
    Member

    I’m a huge fan of my 8′ #3 Sage XP for flat water, dry fly conditions.

    in reply to: Building essays #63883
    anonymous
    Member

    Thanks for all the input- this stuff is making me realize I have to raise my game a few notches- I love that!!!!

    David- “take the reader with you”

    in reply to: Tube Vise Converter #56540
    anonymous
    Member

    I have tied tubes a lot. Yep those Deer hair head type patterns work well on tubes.

    I like using deer hair patterns on tubes Modularly – so tie various colored/style deer hair

    in reply to: Playing with PS and software #63861
    anonymous
    Member

    I think with the post stuff to keep in mind – this is nothing new!!!!!!!!!!!

    I was using unsharp masks

    in reply to: Somebody Help Me Out #26992
    anonymous
    Member

    Mike. I seem to remember that too if its the same piece. An essay or book review or something. I remember it mentioned Walter J. Turrell’s Ancient Angling Authors.

    in reply to: Somebody Help Me Out #26990
    anonymous
    Member

    Zach, I don’t think you will find much discussion of it in the old angling literature since it is a modern practice.

    I just did a quick search of Walton online, and there is not even an instance of the term “release” in his work, nor “immoral”. He does say, “the taking fish in spawning-time may be said to be against nature.” On a quick skim of Cotton I could not find a reference like to one you were thinking of. In his work, the usual expression for an effective fly is something like, “with this you may kill a trout/many.”

    But as the others have pointed out, Walton was always about killing fish in a most conservative fashion, never more than one or a brace or two for himself and perhaps a friend’s meal. He also practiced limited time fishing, more spent waiting and contemplating. Wonder what he would think of fishing all day and catching and releasing 50-100 fish?

    It is ironic that the catch and release fishing that first received practice in Great Britain and around which a long standing tradition developed was for coarse fish. Only in the past couple of decades has even a “sporting ticket” become available at many pay fisheries there.

    According to that great scholarly reference work WikiPedia, catch and release was first introduced in the states as a management tool in the state of Michigan in 1952 as an effort to reduce the cost of stocking hatchery-raised trout. Lee Wulff promoted catch and release as he observed the Atlantic Salmon population dwindle.

    I seem to recall from other sources, the first catch and release area in the country was in the early 1960s in Yellowstone Park, followed later by one on the Battenkill in the mid-60s which Wulff himself supported.

    Will look forward to other comments.

    in reply to: Building essays #63877
    anonymous
    Member

    Interesting insights Zach – like John writing is not in my past or future:) , but your point about

    in reply to: Playing with PS and software #63857
    anonymous
    Member

    John- the 4×6 Singh Ray GND is a

    in reply to: Playing with PS and software #63855
    anonymous
    Member

    John-

    First thing that comes to mind is that

    in reply to: Heptageniidae nymphs #63827
    anonymous
    Member

    Thanks for the “push” all:) it has made me make a few adjustments to my approach , which I hope help.

    This working better ? –

    Will

    in reply to: Pteronarcys Dorsata #63814
    anonymous
    Member

    Yep the 105/2.8

    Will

    in reply to: Fireworks #63852
    anonymous
    Member

    Those are great, Philip. What river runs through Charleston?

    in reply to: Things that Suck Include… #27076
    anonymous
    Member

    Here’s another look. This shows percent of normal precip for the year to date.
    http://water.weather.gov/index.php?layer%5B%5D=0&layer%5B%5D=1&layer%5B%5D=4&timetype=RECENT&loctype=STATE&units=engl&timeframe=year2date&timeYYYY=2008&timeMM=7&timeDD=7&product=per_normal&loc=conus

    Mountain Home topped its yearly averge (about 45 inches) around July 4th, Zach.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,741 through 1,760 (of 2,558 total)