American Angler Cover Call
Blog › Forums › Photography › American Angler Cover Call
- This topic has 110 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated May 8, 2009 at 9:11 pm by
Mike McKeown.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 20, 2008 at 3:14 pm #67538
mark s
MemberLee:
#1: too tall
#2: the middle of the frame is empty
#3: too dark and staticPlus AA wouldn’t want someone that ugly on the cover anyway.
Nov 20, 2008 at 3:37 pm #67539lee church
MemberHe’s sensitive Mark
Nov 20, 2008 at 4:02 pm #67540
Steve K.MemberPhil,
Thanks for the critiques. I’ve learned a lot.
Nov 20, 2008 at 4:09 pm #67541Douglas Barnes
Member…..Should any of you, whether through design or dumb luck, shoot something that you think would work on a cover (keeping in mind all my objections to images in this thread) please don’t hesitate to send it to me.
Phil
Thank you so much Phil for this opportunity. You have obviously spent some time here and whether we give up some cover worthy goods or not, we’ll all come away better photogs because of your input this week on IA. Thanks again!
Doug
Nov 20, 2008 at 4:43 pm #67542Corey Kruitbosch
MemberThis thread has been a HUGE learning experience! Thanks to both Zach and Phil .. Information like this is priceless to a noob like me!
Nov 20, 2008 at 5:23 pm #67543Neal Osborn
MemberPhil –
I thought of you and this thread last night while watching a documentary on Annie Leibovitz. There is scene about the process of choosing a magazine cover and it shows Rolling Stone magazine just after it’s move to New York in the early 70’s and there are the executives, editors, and photographers all sitting around discussing (arguing?) the topic of not only what pictures but more importantly what themes should be included. Having recently read this thread I got a real kick out of watching it unfold (no pun intended).
Nov 20, 2008 at 6:11 pm #67544Anonymous
InactiveInformation like this is priceless to a noob like me!
I am sorry but this is a rediculous comment.
Nov 20, 2008 at 9:05 pm #67545Corey Kruitbosch
MemberI am sorry but this is a rediculous comment. By that I mean calling yourself a noob…that is insulting to those of us who actually are NOOBS!
Nov 21, 2008 at 12:44 am #67546anonymous
MemberWhat an astonishing thread!!!
Putting aside the
Nov 21, 2008 at 7:08 am #67547
Mike McKeownMemberI just spent a few hours looking at past AA and a few other mag covers and have a way better grasp of what does and doesn’t work based on what has been discussed. Methinks creating a template image and uploading it to on cam storage as a reference is a good idea for future reference.
What an awesome idea…. WOWOW
Nov 21, 2008 at 12:45 pm #67548
John BennettMemberIm by no means an expert or professional but I’ve learned a few things (with lots more to learn) about what works and what doesn’t. So take this with the appropriate grain of salt.
Earler in the thread I mentioned “shooting for a cover” and in another thread I’ve mentioned theres shooting for yourself and shooting for the AD.
Two very different things.First and foremost. Read what the AD says he or she is hoping to see. Read it again and be fairly clear.
If they have a seasonal requirement and they often do, make sure you don’t break it. If its a summer requirement, leaves changing colour in the background or new growth of late spring might be deal breakers. At worst select images that are ambigious that could anywhere, anytime but realise they are missing a quality thats sought.
Lots of great photos might get passed on for a cover shots for the smallest of things that have nothing to do with how “good” an image is or isnt.
The fist obviously is “framing”. Most people and this includes myself have a natural tendency to want to fill the frame with the subject.
Doing so doesnt leave an AD room for logos, block text and whatever else. Knowing before hand which magazine your going to send the image to helps as they are all slightly different but there are usually
Nov 21, 2008 at 1:44 pm #67549Phil Monahan
MemberPretty much everything John says here is spot on. I thought I might also explain how we end up with a particular image on the cover:
1. We put out a photo call and receive LOTS of submissions, the vast majority of which we can disqualify immediately, for all of the reasons I’ve used in this thread.
2. Once we’ve got the list narrowed to the images that are technically, seasonally, and compositionally appropriate, everyone on the editorial and art staff picks 4 favorites.
3. From comparing these lists, we get a sense of which two or three images appeal to the most people, so we mock those up.
4. From the mockups, Steve Walburn and I choose the cover.That said, there are times when one image trumps the process, as is the case with the cover that’s on newsstands now. We got the shots of Carter Andrews with a 13-pound brown and said, “That’s a cover.” Done. No photo call necessary. In that we case, we actually built a feature article around the cover image.
When it comes to actually shooting, there’s no substitute for extensive coverage: if you’ve got something set up that might be a cover, shoot as many frames as you can. That increases the chances that you’ll get something just right. That little red jacket in the background of John’s photo is a good example.
I discovered very early on that it’s almost impossible to fish AND shoot pictures, so now I try to travel with a photographer–usually my high school buddy Sandy Hays. When he is in a situation where he thinks a really good photo is possible, he likes to say he’s going to “hose it down,” meaning shoot if from every angle, bracketed, etc.
I am perfectly willing to look at any and all future submissions, but I ask that you evaluate your own shots carefully before you send them to me. Using what you’ve learned from this thread, ask yourself if the shot really works as a cover.
Thanks,
Phil
Nov 21, 2008 at 3:49 pm #67550
Mike McKeownMemberThanks Phil
I showed this thread to one of my local magazine editors and she agrees that it is one of the hardest decisions to make.
Might I ask if there is a way we can see your back issue covers? Now that we know what your look for and what NOT, I would like to put your theory to practice.Regards
Mike
BTW this is their latest copy, and that’s DarrYl Lamperts picture on the cover.
Nov 21, 2008 at 8:03 pm #67551Mike Anderson
MemberWhen I imagine a cover that would make we walk across the room Gray’s Sporting Journal comes to mind. The simplicity and “old timey feel” always makes me want to pick that magazine up and read it cover to cover.
What I would strive for in a cover is what would make this cover and magazine so good that somebody would consider stealing it from the magazine rack in the Dr’s office.I’m sure AA sells a lot more mags then GSJ though.
Nov 21, 2008 at 9:02 pm #67552Phil Monahan
MemberMight I ask if there is a way we can see your back issue covers?
Here’s all the 2008 covers: http://www.flickr.com/photos/29518378@N07/
Nov 22, 2008 at 5:12 am #67553
Mike McKeownMemberThanks You Phil.
Nov 25, 2008 at 3:38 am #67554yuhina
MemberGreat thread! Thanks Phil… not sure if a fish will suitable for cover…but here is a fish in a net with tiny bit of a rod…
Nov 25, 2008 at 3:43 am #67555yuhina
Memberand maybe this one is more summer scenery…
Nov 25, 2008 at 3:55 am #67556yuhina
Member
Nov 27, 2008 at 7:11 pm #67557les_kish
Member
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.