Which Canon lens 70-200 f2.8l or the 70-200 f4 IS
- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated Nov 4, 2007 at 4:49 am by
.
-
Posts
-
Simply there is little in the price should I get the 70-200 f2.8l or the 70 – 200 f4 IS ….Both have almost equal pros and cons …I guess this question has been around a bit on these lenses due to the close price point but there has been no definite answer to be seen…all the info on DP review turns into a cat fight with everyone getting far to precious ….and I thought fly fishers were anal! ……oh and if I were able to justify the $ I would get the 70-200 f2.8l IS
Thanks in advance
AL
i had to make a similar decision a while back with the 24-70/2.8 and the 24-105/4 IS, i ended up picking the IS and i wouldn’t go back.
As already noted it really will come down to how you anticipate using the lens. I think all Canon shooters should at some point seriously consider getting one of Canons four 70-200s. The question then becomes which one. I plan on adding one of them hopefully within the year and currently Im leaning towards the 70-200 f2.8 non is.
As Eric noted I think the primary consideration is wether or not you anticipate using for stationary or action shots. Second to that Id add indoors/outdoors and finally whether or not theres any advantage/disadvantage to the
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.