Scott s3

Blog › Forums › Fly Fishing › Scott s3

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Oct 30, 2006 at 1:53 pm #1609
    scot
    Member

    Does anyone know why Scott makes the s3 6 and 8 weights in 9 foot but the 7 weight is 9’6″ or 10? Really wanted the 7 weight. I might be wrong but everywhere i looked thats what i came up with.

    Oct 30, 2006 at 5:54 pm #13630
    david king
    Member

    You would probably have to go with a S3s. I don’t think there is any difference except that its blue.

    Oct 30, 2006 at 10:22 pm #13631
    Jack Cummings
    Member

    I bought the 9′ 6″, 7 weight S3 just as they came out. I bought it for Michigan steelheading but since I moved it’s still a fine rod for large and smallmouth bassin’. I’m not so sure you will notice the extra 6″… in fact, depending where and how you fish you might find it a blessing for line control.

    Nov 7, 2006 at 8:55 pm #13632
    Avatar photonone
    Member

    Yet still the 6 inch difference makes quite a difference in how the rod feels. Especially the tip-swing is noticeable of these longer rods vs the regular 9 ft’ers.

    Jay

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.