New World Record Brown Trout

Blog Forums Fly Fishing New World Record Brown Trout

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4415
    anonymous
    Member

    Potential new world record brown trout caught on the Manistee yesterday morning. Surprised no one has mentioned it yet. 41-7.

    http://www.freep.com/article/20090909/SPORTS10/90909087/1354/sports/A-new-world-record-for-brown-trout

    A couple of more links on my flyflinger blog.

    #38847
    Grant Wright
    Member

    Nice fish….it’s a shame he killed it.

    #38848
    cole m.
    Member

    It’s a hog for sure.

    4lb mono vs 30lb braided, you be the judge!

    #38849

    It’s a hog for sure.

    4lb mono vs 30lb braided, you be the judge!

    Great point, Cole!
    Here is the AR fish:
    http://www.duanehada.com/ripcollins.htm

    And I love how a lot of the articles are naming the gear used…maybe some endorsements to follow. But to be honest, I would likely do the same thing. “I caught this world record on my Sage rod, using an Abel reel, while wearing Oakley shades, Ex Officio shirt, and MK pants. Afterward, I drank several Bud Lights…….”

    http://www.mlive.com/outdoors/index.ssf/2009/09/rockford_angler_tom_healy_hook.html

    D.

    #38850
    Michael Exl
    Member

    The “Holy Grail” of the Great Lakes the lake run brown. Too bad the guy killed it. Wonder if it was a Wisconsin fish, they have the largest brown stocking program in the GL’s I believe.

    #38851
    lauren
    Member

    Precisely my thoughts, Grant.

    #38852
    chris adams
    Member

    I just forwarded the articles to my dad.

    #38853
    chris adams
    Member

    I also agree, very sad that he killed such a great fish!

    #38854
    Eric DeWitt
    Member

    There was another big brown caught in the Pere Marquette a couple weeks ago.

    #38855

    Nice fish….it’s a shame he killed it.

    lets not put our noses in the air, no one can say what they would have done had they been the lucky recipient on the other end of the line. Besides, its not like someone caught it last year when it weighed 39# or the year before when it weighed 35#.

    I believe you have to keep the fish and weigh it on an igfa certified scale for it to become certified anyways.

    I am all for purism and a 99.9% advocate of catch and release fishing, however if i caught a 40+ pound brown, it would be properly weighed and re-weighed to be certain that it was official, and if that meant that the fish died, then I would probably have it mounted and placed in a museum.

    #38856
    Avatar photoBob Riggins
    Member

    I personally think the fish should hire a lawyer and sue the guy (see Cass Sunstein).

    #38857
    Rob Snowhite
    Member

    tiny elvis would say “that fish is huge man”

    #38858
    Kyle Kulig
    Member

    Well played Mr. Snowhite “tiny E” was the tits

    #38859

    IGFA rules do require the fish to be weighed on a certified scale, but it need not be “kept”.

    #38860
    cole m.
    Member

    Craig, can you give me a little more info as to what position the fish has to be in for photos? Measurement points etc..

    #38861

    I am all for putting fish back in the drink but in the case of a world record you can hardly fault the fellow.

    #38862
    Tim Pommer
    Member

    Awesome fish!

    #38863
    tradd d
    Member

    What a piggy and always sad to see one gripped like that and especially killed, sad!

    #38864

    Cole,

    Cut from the on line version of the IGFA rules:

    PHOTOGRAPHS
    Photographs showing the full length of the fish, the rod and reel used to make the catch, and the scale used to weigh the fish must accompany each record application. A photograph of the angler with the fish is also required.

    For species identification, the clearest possible photos should be
    submitted. This is especially important in the cases of hybrids and fishes that may be confused with similar species. Shark applications should include a photograph of the shark’s teeth, and of the head and back taken from above in addition to the photographs taken from the side. Whether the shark has or does not have a ridge between the dorsal fins should be clearly evident in this photograph.

    In all cases, photographs should be taken of the fish in a hanging
    position and also lying on a flat surface on its side. The fish should be
    broadside to the camera and no part of the fish should be obscured.

    The fins must be fully extended and not obscured with the hands, and the jaw or bill clearly shown. Avoid obscuring the keels of sharks and tunas with a tail rope.

    When photographing a fish lying on its side, the surface beneath
    the fish should be smooth and a ruler or marked tape place beside the
    fish if possible. Photographs from various angles are most helpful.
    An additional photograph of the fish on the scale with actual weight visible helps to expedite the application.

    Photos taken by daylight with a reproducible-type negative film are
    highly recommended if at all possible.



    The IGFA rules are available at http://www.igfa.org.  They are under the Fishing tab.  You’ll have to join the IGFA to have access to the record list.

    Don’t hesitate to email or PM me with any questions about IGFA rules.  If the answer isn’t clear from the rule book, I’ll contact the IGFA headquarters and get an answer.  

    For a summary of rigging and submitting for fly rod records, see my American Angler article, posted at our web site http://www.flatslander.com.

    Craig

    #38865

    And the genetically engineered rainbow trout record was broken with another triploid last week
    http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/fishing/news/story?id=4466614

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.