Little Red Public Input
Blog › Forums › Fly Fishing › Little Red Public Input
- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated Dec 4, 2005 at 1:27 am by
brian dunigan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dec 2, 2005 at 10:03 pm #997
Phil LandryMemberHey guys-
Dec 2, 2005 at 10:25 pm #10255Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerThanks Phil.
Dec 2, 2005 at 10:35 pm #10256Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerMy response:
Issues:
1) Inadequate variety in stocking locations resulting in bait fishing/taking clusters around stocking ramps (i.e. Winkley Shoals).
2) Lack of minimum flow.
3) Inadequate public access in the Jon’s Pocket peninsula.
4) Lack of walk-in access at Mossy Shoals C&R
5) Open ended C&R philosophy fundamentally flawed given scientific data of brown trout migratory browsing and feeding
6) Unclear personal property boundaries on borders of river.Advice:
1) Employ stocking rafts most of the time in order to stock rainbow trout.
Dec 2, 2005 at 11:30 pm #10257
Phil LandryMemberDec 3, 2005 at 7:10 am #10258brian dunigan
MemberI’m going to play devil’s advocate and defend the bait chunkers, just because that’s the ornery type of guy I am.
You said something about “chumming with corn has got to stop.”
Dec 3, 2005 at 1:49 pm #10259Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerBd-
I think you’ll find that on this particular question Arkansans and Tennesseans are further apart than you’d believe.
Dec 3, 2005 at 3:17 pm #10260brian dunigan
MemberI appreciate what you’re saying from an aesthetic sense, but from a macroeconomic point of view, the government is running something vaguely resembling a Kroger, in that revenue generation is the objective.
All our tailwater fisheries, Arkansas or Tennessee or whereever, are managed to “provide recreational opportunities” for as many people as possible.
Dec 3, 2005 at 3:33 pm #10261Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey Brian-
I agree entirely with your economic assessment and the reasons for the Game and Fish put-and-take rules and I do agree that a component of the scheme should be based on the principles you list.
However I have to point out that the White River system really is a substantially different place than the waters you fish, including the Cumberland, which it most closely resembles.
On any given day on the 7-mile Norfork tailwater, which supports the highest concentration of fish per mile, you will definitely see more fly fishermen than bait fishermen.
Dec 3, 2005 at 4:27 pm #10262brian dunigan
MemberI will always vote for less, but bigger fish.
Zach
I have mixed feelings about, probably because I’m such a generalist when it comes to fishing.
Dec 3, 2005 at 4:58 pm #10263Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerA lot of people approach fly fishing as a progressive exercise in specialization
That’s an astute observation, and it may be that right now I am just going through a big fish phase.
Dec 4, 2005 at 1:27 am #10264brian dunigan
MemberWe don’t get many great opportunities for dry fly fishing here, but I have to admit that it sure is neat to cast to a rising fish and have it come up and sip the fly off the surface.
I’ve never caught a big fish on a dry, but if you could ever consistently get 24-inch trout to hit on the surface, I can see how it would be tough to go back to anything else.
I’ll never get to the point of “fly fishing is religion and dry fly fishing is high church,” but it’s a fun way to fish when conditions are right.
bd
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.