Canon 650D
- This topic has 17 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated Nov 12, 2012 at 6:44 am by
.
-
Posts
-
Just looking for any first hand experience people have had with them? I’m going to pick one up after my exams are over. Only reason I’m going for the 650 rather than the 550 is that the continuous autofocus in video mode sounds like it could be really useful. The camera will be paired with a Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. A friend of mine has the lens, and so far I’ve found it superb. I think they should be a good combination.
Jack,
No personal experience w/ that model (I shoot an EOS 50D), but the reviews I read are overall positive.
While I still use older technology in terms of my camera, I do use the 15-85 as my everyday lens and I really like it. Works good for stream pics and landscapes.
Just read the section on the autofocus in video mode. Sounds like it’s far from perfect, although it still sounds like an improvement over the 600d. I’ll try and have a play before I buy. Cheers for the advice.
I’ve just noticed that the 7D can be brought as a kit with the 15-85mm lens for only a few hundred more than the 650d + same lens. How big of a difference between the two bodies is there in a day to day sense? I’m also conscious that the 7d has been around since 2009, whereas the 650d is brand new as of a couple of months ago.
I’d buy the 7d hands down. I’d also consider going with a 17-55 2.8 over the 15-85. The 17-55 is a pro quality lens you’ll never outgrow as long as you shoot the crop body.
Thanks Mike. The 17-55 would just tip it outside the price range I think. Ideally I’d like to keep it under $2,500 NZ. Particularly as I’ll need to buy a handful of bits and pieces for it.
Thanks Mike. The 17-55 would just tip it outside the price range I think. Ideally I’d like to keep it under $2,500 NZ. Particularly as I’ll need to buy a handful of bits and pieces for it.
I don’t know anything about Canon systems but I would suggest re-prioritizing your money into the best lenses you can buy. Bodies will come and go, it’s the lenses that stick around.
Just my 2 cents.
db
Douglas is right. The lens is where you want to spend the extra money. Cheaper lenses don’t hold value as well and can be harder to sell when you do upgrade.
Thanks guys. I’ve been doing a bit of reading and it seems like the durability and weather sealing of the 7d may be well worth it for a fishing camera. The price difference between the bodies is relatively small at the moment, but quite significant between the lenses.
Whilst I know that the lenses are the things to invest in, at this stage and with my limited budget (I’m a student) I’d like to get a foot in the door in both camps, then look to upgrade once I’m working. I hate the idea of buying anything that I’ll want to upgrade as soon as I’ve bought it. I’ve shot a lot with the 15-85mm and at least feel confident that it’s a lens I’ll be happy with for the next wee while.
Or am I just being stupid and should just buy the 17-55mm and a cheap body?
P.s. Potn? Is that photography on the net?
Jack,
Something to consider with the 7D vs 650D – the 7D is heavier, bulkier and will require a better tripod. Something to consider if you are doing a lot of hiking. Don’t be put off by the 7D being a couple of years old, it’s still an excellent camera. Having said that I agree with the others, buy the cheaper body and spend your money on the better quality lenses.
Thanks Darryl – I remember seeing some great video from your 7d! Bulk etc isn’t too much of an issue as I think the weatherproofing and sturdiness of the camera is more than compensation.
I’m at a slightly strange position in my life in that I’ve got 1 year left of University, after which (with a touch of luck) I should be making OK money. It’s quite hard to work out where to spend the money. I’m thinking that I’ll buy something good although not necessarily hugely expensive in both capacities. The 7d strikes me as a body that I could keep for a very long time, whereas I know I’ll buy new lenses in the future.
Is the 17-55 a lifetime lens? i.e. one I’ll never want to replace. Because if there are better options in that focal range then I’d rather spend a little less money at the moment when money is tight and upgrade later when I can afford the top end gear.
The only reasons I can think of to get rid of a 17-55 would be if you move into a full frame body or switch brands.
Jack,
I agree with Mike, the 17-55 is a great lens! I use the 10-22 (17-55 was around when I bought it) but it’s only fractionally cheaper than the 17-55. Spend the money on the glass, you won’t be sorry.
Alright… I think I will be picking up the 17-55 instead. Argh, getting expensive – but I’m of a mindset that if you’re spending money you may as well spend a bit more to do it right.
Cheers for all of your advice guys!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.