Binocular Recommendation?
Blog › Forums › Fly Fishing › Binocular Recommendation?
- This topic has 9 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated Oct 27, 2009 at 1:07 am by
Eric DeWitt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Oct 21, 2009 at 12:51 pm #4535
michael pope
MemberThis is not a fishing question, so I hope that it is appropriate here. After a trip to Yellowstone, I have really been wanting a decent pair of binoculars. Here’s the catch, I don’t want to break the bank, I just can’t spend $1000+ dollars on binoculars. I am looking at the Nikon Monarch in 8X42 for around $200-$250. So, does anyone have any recommendations in a similiar price range. I didn’t know this till I started looking at them, but Nikon has a warranty policy that reminds me of the fly rod industry. $10 + shipping “no fault” lifetime warranty. Thanks for any response.
MikeOct 22, 2009 at 5:31 pm #39780Billy Belsom
MemberI have those exact binocs and am very pleased. I am no expert but did some research when I bought them and the 8×42 was the cream of the crop.
Oct 22, 2009 at 5:39 pm #39781brian barnes
MemberDuring my last binocular purchase I found this link especially helpful:
http://www.birds.cornell.edu/Publications/LivingBird/Winter2005/Age_Binos.html
Oct 22, 2009 at 5:49 pm #39782Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerWe got refurbished Nikon binoculars from Sierra Trading Post.
Oct 22, 2009 at 7:02 pm #39783chris adams
MemberI have been using a pair of Leupold’s for close to 10 yrs now with no complaints.
Oct 22, 2009 at 7:06 pm #39784
Bob RigginsMemberI was going to suggest Sierra Trading Post also.
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:51 am #39785
John BennettMemberGlass is glass. The better the optics, the more its going to cost.
I think as long as you stay with a reputable maker (such as Nikon) you’ll be happy. I might suggest finding 10 x 35/40ish if you can. At 8x you might find them a little weak, although at 42 they will let in a fair amount of light, so not a bad trade off if you stick with 8 x 42.Oct 23, 2009 at 12:21 pm #39786Billy Belsom
MemberActually as of about 4 years ago (give or take) the image clarity of the 8x was noticeably superior to the image clarity of the 10x.
Oct 23, 2009 at 1:35 pm #39787Anonymous
InactiveCheckout the Audubon Swift.
8.5 x 44. Fantastic build quality. Incredible durable. And, are you ready for this….waterproof. Fishing, birding, sightseeing, hunting…you are bound to encounter rain.
The folks at Audubon know what they’re doing.
You can find them for under $300.
Oct 27, 2009 at 1:07 am #39788Eric DeWitt
MemberAlso take a look at Leupold stuff, they have some different offerings in the $200-350 range. I would highly recommend going to a local gander mtn, bass pro shops, etc. that has a decent selection and looking thru them. The test i always give them is pick some text on the other side of the store, start with it in the center of the frame, and move it towards the edge of the frame. The closer you can get the text to the edge before it loses sharpness, the better the glass. Also, 8x’s are typically brighter than 10x’s, especially when the diameter of the glass is the same. I would lean towards 8x if you are in the woods alot, since you lose light quicker in there, and 10x if your in more open country with longer light.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.