Thoughts
Blog › Forums › Photography › Thoughts
- This topic has 14 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated Jan 27, 2009 at 4:37 am by
john michael white.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jan 13, 2009 at 3:13 am #7907
john michael white
MemberI have been debating about the following two pictures. I am kind of torn and unsure. I like them, and the action that the blurring suggests, I am just not sure if they work or not. What do y’all think, do the images work or are they too out of focus to be any good for anything?

Jan 13, 2009 at 3:33 am #66384lee church
MemberJMW, Hope you’re feeling better bud.
1. Not a bad shot I’d put it w/ the collection just because it’s part of the story line.
2. It almost looks like you used a Tilt or something, almost.
Jan 13, 2009 at 3:47 am #66385Shannon Drawe
MemberBlurs are always a tough call. My personal rule is that something somewhere (it could be almost anything) has to be sharp. Otherwise, in my eyes, it’s an unintentional situation. shannon
Jan 13, 2009 at 10:28 am #66386
Mike McKeownMemberKinda agree with Shannon, there has to be something to hold the focus… they are nice, but not quite there…
This from a novice…Jan 13, 2009 at 2:28 pm #66387john michael white
MemberThanks guys.
Jan 15, 2009 at 8:18 pm #66388
Chad SimcoxMemberHere is my critical, honest feedback.
The first photo is a good personal memory, but I don’t think it’s useful for anything on a publishing level. The shot doesn’t tell the viewer anything. I have no idea what the photo is really about other than netting a fish. There seems to be no true focal point. We don’t really see the fish. The motion blur looks unintentional, it’s not apparent/prominent enough to suggest that you’re trying to show that action. Over all the image is very flat, both in contrast and in composition. The “focal point” is centered, that’s bad composition. I want to see something more dynamic than a hand coming from the side of the frame to the center. The muddy mess at the bottom of the frame looks like a smudge on the lens. I can’t really tell whats going on, and it doesn’t add anything to the photo.
I can’t see the second photo, it’s marked as “content protected by owner”.http://society6.com/grainfarmer Fly Fishing and Landscape open edition Photography prints.
http://grainfarmer.vsco.co/ iPhone photos
http://instagram.com/chad_simcox InstagramJan 15, 2009 at 8:28 pm #66389john michael white
MemberGood feedback Chad.
Jan 21, 2009 at 10:51 pm #66390
David AndersonMemberJMW, I can’t see the photos ?
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
Jan 22, 2009 at 1:04 am #66391john michael white
MemberDavid,
I had deleted them off my website, since they weren’t that good.
Jan 22, 2009 at 11:00 am #66392
David AndersonMemberAny chump can take a nice photo of a static situation these days on their flash DSLR and wizz bang softwear, but motion is one of the hardest things to capture on a camera and it can take zillions of frames and experimenting to get right.
The shots above look ok to me and if included in a photo spread may well be fine.
The only negative comment I would offer is that they’re not cropped tight enough because IMHO you don’t need all that background to make the point.
The angler netting the fish is cool.
www.dsaphoto.com
A picture is thousand words that takes less than a second while a thousand words is a picture that takes a month.
Jan 22, 2009 at 4:22 pm #66393
Ben CochranMemberI am not one for processing an image in order to save it as much as I like it a lot more when the photographer maps everything out, prior to the shot. Having said that, IMHO, blur works out best with B&W as it can add a very dramatic artistic impact to the image. I feel that different crops would also add a tremendous amount of additional effect to these shots and you may end up with some really cool shots.
If it is ok with you, I would be more than happy to do a little post edit and repost your exact same shots with a different crop and perhaps conversion, to better illustrate what I am talking about and with your permission…
Jan 22, 2009 at 4:34 pm #66394john michael white
MemberSure Ben, you have my permission to show me what you are talking about with these shots.
Jan 22, 2009 at 5:07 pm #66395
Ben CochranMemberHere ya go… I only spent a short bit of time on these but I hope you see what I am talking about.


Jan 23, 2009 at 2:51 pm #66396john michael white
MemberThanks Ben.
Jan 27, 2009 at 4:37 am #66397john michael white
MemberWell Ben, I played around a little bit tonight, and here is what I came up with. Color, Dark B&W, Light B&W, and sepia versions.
Color:


Dark B&W:


Light B&W:


And Sepia:


-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.