Fly Line Head Weights

Blog Forums Fly Fishing Fly Line Head Weights

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5584

    Does anyone know where I can find the head weights for SA lines – the Expert Distance WF5F in particular?

    #49131
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Tim?

    Zach

    #49132
    Tim Pommer
    Member

    Michael – which weight?

    #49133
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Expert Distance WF5F, Tim.

    #49134
    Tim Pommer
    Member

    Ha, oh…Sorry, I didnt read the entire thing.

    #49135

    Thanks, Tim! And you as well Zach!

    #49136
    Tim Pommer
    Member

    Michael – can I ask why you’re interested in the head weight of that line?

    #49137
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    I’m curious to know as well.

    #49138

    Gentlemen:

    I’m trying to identify new lines for two of my rods – a Winston BIIX and a Scott S4. Both 4 piece, 9 wt, 5 weights. Unfortunately these days it’s a trial and error process to determine the right line with so many different types of rods and all the new complex tapers in lines. (Yes, I’m old enough to remember when a 5 weight line was a 5 weight line!) Suffice it to say that buying $75 lines to ‘try out’ on my rods is not the optimum methodology. So, I decided to do a bit of homework first.

    What I’ve tried on the rods so far:

    Line

    #49139
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Michael –

    Two stories, in fact:

    Cooking Up Some Lines

    Taper Tech

    Zach

    #49140

    Ha! Guess I should read the magazines!

    #49141
    Scott G.
    Member

    I’ve been watching the board for awhile, but this is my first post.

    #49142
    Zach Matthews
    The Itinerant Angler

    Hey Scott –

    Thanks for joining up man.

    #49143

    Zach is dead on with the “by feel” comment. Hence, my need to cast a bunch of lines. Especially when one ads the third variable – casting style.

    #49144

    Michael, wulff TT and winstons go together like peanut butter and jelly

    did you try a GPX taper or half size up taper on the scott? that might help but sometimes a heaver front head makes for hard presentations

    #49145
    Chris Beech
    Member

    Another vote for the GPX on the Scott S4 #5.

    Comparing head weights is one thing, but are you casting an equal length of line each time you test the different tapers?

    Another long distance line to consider is the Barrio GT140 which has an 88′ head ( :o) http://www.flylineshop.com/barrio-fly-lines.html

    Best Regards,

    Beechy

    #49146
    Scott G.
    Member

    Zach- thanks for the welcome.  I enjoy the content and found the articles pretty interesting.

    Michael’s numbers are interesting.  Below are the grains per foot of head.

    Line                   Head Length            Head Weight        Grains/foot

    Rio Gold                    47′                          228                       4.85
    Rio Trout LT               47′                           240                      5.11
    Wulff TT                    40′                           192                      4.80
    Rio Windcutter           43                            190                      4.42
    SA Expert Distance     69                            310                     4.49

    Most are in the 4.5 to 5.0 grains/foot range.  My point about line rating being determined by the first 30 feet is that the standard is at a fixed distance on the line, not by head length.  Given how close the weight/length of the heads are, at 43′ (the shortest head length of the bunch) I would guess that most of the lines still have a comparable weight.  Michael’s table shows that it quickly changes beyond that point.  As Chris hinted, maybe a better comparison is looking at differences in the weight of the line at the point that Michael typically carries.

    As the articles mention, this is only one element in the equation.  Interesting discussion.

    #49147
    Tim Pommer
    Member

    Because the line tapers and varies in diameter, you cant assume a uniform Grains/Foot metric.  Only level lines maintain a constant grain/foot number.

    Chris nailed it by saying:

    Comparing head weights is one thing, but are you casting an equal length of line each time you test the different tapers?

    The AFTMA Standard for line weights was developed to keep things simple.  Once you start considering head weights, things get way overly complicated because 90% of anglers are not fishing the entire head but more likely within 30′ mark (hence the standard).  Of the remaining 10%, only half of those are fishing distances beyond 50′.  Obviously members of this board are above the average angler, but I highly doubt many of you are consistently making 50′ casts for rising fish.  If you are, consider getting a bit closer to your target without scaring it and I will guarantee your catch rates go up.

    Obviously, rods are getting faster which is leading to lines getting heavier – which can lead to some confusion on what to buy.  However, all major line manufacturers are calling out which lines are for ‘fast-action rods’ and which are not.  You’ll see things like, .5 heavy or 1.5 heavy. Shooting heads are the only lines that really need to be classified in terms of head weight because it’s the only line that anglers consistently use the entire head every time they cast (which is still only about 30′ – they shoot the rest of the line).  Hence why our Streamer Express series is classified in grains and not WF #.

    I work with customers every day to help decipher the best line for their new rod.  Never do I give them the head weight or even the grain weight within the first 30′ because this just confuses people in the end.

    #49148

    I am fishing a somewhat unique situation here. The Delaware River system (West Branch and Main Stem primarily) require casts to rising fish of 60-70 feet with #16-20 dry flies. Any closer than 50-60 feet and you will never see the fish again.

    #49149
    Chris Beech
    Member

    In that case my vote would go to the Scientific Anglers XXD.

    Best Regards,

    Beechy

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 21 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.