Somebody Help Me Out
Blog › Forums › Fly Fishing › Somebody Help Me Out
- This topic has 10 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated Jul 8, 2008 at 5:48 pm by
anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jul 8, 2008 at 12:28 am #3240
Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerHey guys –
I am writing something a little outside the usual pale of what I have written and I am trying to remember something.
Jul 8, 2008 at 12:42 am #26983Aaron Otto
MemberZach don’t quote me on this, but I’m going to say it was Cotton – He argued it was immoral to release a fish you’ve tricked of your own fur and feather.
Jul 8, 2008 at 11:58 am #26984
John BennettMemberI thought it was Wulff that came to argue against C&R??? Dont know why but thats the name that springs to mind.
Jul 8, 2008 at 12:40 pm #26985Anonymous
InactiveWulff certainly did not practice C&R
Jul 8, 2008 at 1:06 pm #26986Rich Kovars
MemberWulff certainly did not practice C&R
He didn’t in the beginning, but he became a big proponent of C&R.
Jul 8, 2008 at 1:15 pm #26987Zach Matthews
The Itinerant AnglerYeah, actually, Lee Wulff is widely credited as being the Johnny Appleseed of C&R in America.
I am thinking of someone much older.
Jul 8, 2008 at 2:49 pm #26988Aaron Otto
MemberZ – it’s likely that it’s IW. The later editions of Complete Angler had Cotton’s addition in them and I could have their contributions confused.
Jul 8, 2008 at 3:48 pm #26989
John BennettMemberSomewhere in the deep recesses of my mind I can’t help but think LW had some feelings about the harvesting of Salmon in the context of protecting the strain.. Can’t be certain, I could be way off base. It would have been some obscure reference I read along time ago.
On the surface IW I think of as being a stuanch conservaltionist and while LW might be the forrunner for c&r, IW planted the seeds. Ive read lots of references to him and C&R. So id be surprised to find his name as arguing that C&R was immorral.
History was never a strong suit for me though 🙂
Jul 8, 2008 at 5:28 pm #26990anonymous
MemberZach, I don’t think you will find much discussion of it in the old angling literature since it is a modern practice.
I just did a quick search of Walton online, and there is not even an instance of the term “release” in his work, nor “immoral”. He does say, “the taking fish in spawning-time may be said to be against nature.” On a quick skim of Cotton I could not find a reference like to one you were thinking of. In his work, the usual expression for an effective fly is something like, “with this you may kill a trout/many.”
But as the others have pointed out, Walton was always about killing fish in a most conservative fashion, never more than one or a brace or two for himself and perhaps a friend’s meal. He also practiced limited time fishing, more spent waiting and contemplating. Wonder what he would think of fishing all day and catching and releasing 50-100 fish?
It is ironic that the catch and release fishing that first received practice in Great Britain and around which a long standing tradition developed was for coarse fish. Only in the past couple of decades has even a “sporting ticket” become available at many pay fisheries there.
According to that great scholarly reference work WikiPedia, catch and release was first introduced in the states as a management tool in the state of Michigan in 1952 as an effort to reduce the cost of stocking hatchery-raised trout. Lee Wulff promoted catch and release as he observed the Atlantic Salmon population dwindle.
I seem to recall from other sources, the first catch and release area in the country was in the early 1960s in Yellowstone Park, followed later by one on the Battenkill in the mid-60s which Wulff himself supported.
Will look forward to other comments.
Jul 8, 2008 at 5:28 pm #26991Mike Anderson
MemberZach I remember reading about this in AA. Look in last years issue around sept- nov.
Jul 8, 2008 at 5:48 pm #26992anonymous
MemberMike. I seem to remember that too if its the same piece. An essay or book review or something. I remember it mentioned Walter J. Turrell’s Ancient Angling Authors.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.